ACWX vs VEA overlap - what they share and where they differ
ACWX and VEA share 68.5% of their weight across 717 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
ACWX and VEA
68.5%
717 shared positions
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 1,685 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 16.2%·Holdings of ACWX
VEA
VANGUARD DEVELOPED MARKETS INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 3,594 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 14.9%·Holdings of VEA
Reported positions cover ACWX 98%, VEA 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VEA vs ACWX side by side
ACWXiShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
1,685
stock positions reported to the SEC
28.7% of its weight is in 968 names VEA does not hold
VEAVANGUARD DEVELOPED MARKETS INDEX FUND
3,594
stock positions reported to the SEC
18.9% of its weight is in 2,877 names ACWX does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: ACWX has 4.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| ACWX | VEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 1,685 | 3,594 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 16.2% | 14.9% |
| Largest position | TSM 4.9% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 3.2% |
| Held alone | 968 positions, 28.7% | 2,877 positions, 18.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In ACWX | In VEA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. | 2.48% | 3.17% | 2.48% |
| ASMLASML Holding N.V. | 1.73% | 2.36% | 1.73% |
| SKHYSK hynix Inc. | 1.70% | 3.02% | 1.70% |
| HSBCHSBC HOLDINGS PLC | 0.98% | 1.00% | 0.98% |
| MUFGMitsubishi Corporation | 0.89% | 0.93% | 0.89% |
| ROCHE HOLDING AG | 0.87% | 0.93% | 0.87% |
| RYROYAL BANK OF CANADA | 0.79% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
| NVSNovartis AG | 0.77% | 0.90% | 0.77% |
| AZNASTRAZENECA PLC | 0.70% | 0.87% | 0.70% |
| NESTLE S.A. | 0.70% | 0.82% | 0.70% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in ACWX
Only in VEA
Questions people ask
Is ACWX the same as VEA?
68.5% of their weight sits in the same 717 holdings. ACWX also reports TSM, TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED, BABA, which the other does not. VEA also reports UNICREDIT SPA, AIR LIQUIDE SA, CIE FINANCIERE RICHEMONT SA, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between ACWX and VEA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of ACWX and 99% of VEA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VEA or ACWX?
ACWX reports 1,685 stock positions and VEA reports 3,594. 28.7% of ACWX's weight sits in names VEA does not hold, and 18.9% of VEA's weight in names ACWX does not hold. The ten largest positions are 16.2% of ACWX and 14.9% of VEA.
How do ACWX and VEA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: ACWX has 4.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
VEA against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.