AIA vs MCHI overlap - what they share and where they differ
AIA and MCHI share 21.9% of their weight across 21 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
AIA and MCHI
21.9%
21 shared positions
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 50 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 69.0%·Holdings of AIA
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
Reported positions cover 96% of the fund, 500 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 42.0%·Holdings of MCHI
Reported positions cover AIA 100%, MCHI 96% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
MCHI vs AIA side by side
AIAiShares Asia 50 ETF
50
stock positions reported to the SEC
77.7% of its weight is in 29 names MCHI does not hold
MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF
500
stock positions reported to the SEC
43.1% of its weight is in 479 names AIA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: AIA has 25.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| AIA | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 50 | 500 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 69.0% | 42.0% |
| Largest position | TSM 24.1% | TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED 13.9% |
| Held alone | 29 positions, 77.7% | 479 positions, 43.1% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 96% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In AIA | In MCHI | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED | 4.38% | 13.93% | 4.38% |
| BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 3.50% | 9.42% | 3.50% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION | 2.03% | 4.08% | 2.03% |
| INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 1.31% | 2.64% | 1.31% |
| BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.07% |
| MEITUAN | 0.99% | 1.98% | 0.99% |
| XIAOMI CORPORATION | 0.95% | 2.37% | 0.95% |
| NTESNETEASE, INC. | 0.89% | 1.68% | 0.89% |
| PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) COMPANY OF CHINA, LTD. | 0.84% | 2.05% | 0.84% |
| JDJD.COM, INC. | 0.69% | 1.27% | 0.69% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in AIA
Only in MCHI
Questions people ask
Is AIA the same as MCHI?
21.9% of their weight sits in the same 21 holdings. AIA also reports TSM, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SKHY, which the other does not. MCHI also reports LENOVO GROUP LIMITED, CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., CHINA SHENHUA ENERGY COMPANY LIMITED, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between AIA and MCHI measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of AIA and 96% of MCHI, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, MCHI or AIA?
AIA reports 50 stock positions and MCHI reports 500. 77.7% of AIA's weight sits in names MCHI does not hold, and 43.1% of MCHI's weight in names AIA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 69.0% of AIA and 42.0% of MCHI.
How do AIA and MCHI differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: AIA has 25.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.