AIQ vs CGGO overlap - what they share and where they differ
AIQ and CGGO share 32.8% of their weight across 16 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
AIQ and CGGO
32.8%
16 shared positions
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 84 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 42.7%·Holdings of AIQ
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 105 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 35.3%·Holdings of CGGO
Reported positions cover AIQ 100%, CGGO 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
CGGO vs AIQ side by side
AIQGlobal X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
84
stock positions reported to the SEC
51.3% of its weight is in 68 names CGGO does not hold
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
105
stock positions reported to the SEC
62.8% of its weight is in 89 names AIQ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: AIQ has 32.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| AIQ | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 84 | 105 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 42.7% | 35.3% |
| Largest position | SKHY 7.1% | TSM 6.6% |
| Held alone | 68 positions, 51.3% | 89 positions, 62.8% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In AIQ | In CGGO | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 5.77% | 5.69% | 5.69% |
| SKHYSK hynix Inc. | 7.11% | 5.32% | 5.32% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 3.24% | 3.70% | 3.24% |
| TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 3.02% | 6.62% | 3.02% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 2.72% | 3.02% | 2.72% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. | 4.79% | 2.42% | 2.42% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION | 2.36% | 2.04% | 2.04% |
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 2.70% | 1.39% | 1.39% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS, INC. | 2.30% | 1.37% | 1.37% |
| SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT | 1.84% | 1.30% | 1.30% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in AIQ
Only in CGGO
Questions people ask
Is AIQ the same as CGGO?
32.8% of their weight sits in the same 16 holdings. AIQ also reports AMD, CSCO, ORCL, which the other does not. CGGO also reports WDC, ASML, CAPITAL GROUP CENTRAL CASH FUND, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between AIQ and CGGO measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of AIQ and 100% of CGGO, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, CGGO or AIQ?
AIQ reports 84 stock positions and CGGO reports 105. 51.3% of AIQ's weight sits in names CGGO does not hold, and 62.8% of CGGO's weight in names AIQ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 42.7% of AIQ and 35.3% of CGGO.
How do AIQ and CGGO differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: AIQ has 32.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.