AIQ vs CGGR overlap - what they share and where they differ
AIQ and CGGR share 34.2% of their weight across 17 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
AIQ and CGGR
34.2%
17 shared positions
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 84 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 42.7%·Holdings of AIQ
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 88 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 46.2%·Holdings of CGGR
Reported positions cover AIQ 100%, CGGR 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
CGGR vs AIQ side by side
AIQGlobal X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
84
stock positions reported to the SEC
51.3% of its weight is in 67 names CGGR does not hold
CGGRCapital Group Growth ETF
88
stock positions reported to the SEC
46.5% of its weight is in 71 names AIQ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: AIQ has 20.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| AIQ | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 84 | 88 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 42.7% | 46.2% |
| Largest position | SKHY 7.1% | META 7.1% |
| Held alone | 67 positions, 51.3% | 71 positions, 46.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In AIQ | In CGGR | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 5.77% | 4.86% | 4.86% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 3.24% | 5.40% | 3.24% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 2.72% | 6.42% | 2.72% |
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 2.70% | 5.16% | 2.70% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM, INC. | 2.73% | 2.69% | 2.69% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION | 2.36% | 4.37% | 2.36% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS, INC. | 2.30% | 7.09% | 2.30% |
| TSLATESLA, INC. | 2.29% | 5.85% | 2.29% |
| NFLXNETFLIX, INC. | 2.43% | 1.85% | 1.85% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 2.97% | 1.79% | 1.79% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in AIQ
Only in CGGR
Questions people ask
Is AIQ the same as CGGR?
34.2% of their weight sits in the same 17 holdings. AIQ also reports AMD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., CSCO, which the other does not. CGGR also reports V, TDG, CAPITAL GROUP CENTRAL CASH FUND, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between AIQ and CGGR measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of AIQ and 100% of CGGR, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, CGGR or AIQ?
AIQ reports 84 stock positions and CGGR reports 88. 51.3% of AIQ's weight sits in names CGGR does not hold, and 46.5% of CGGR's weight in names AIQ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 42.7% of AIQ and 46.2% of CGGR.
How do AIQ and CGGR differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: AIQ has 20.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.