BBJP vs EFA overlap - what they share and where they differ
BBJP and EFA share 22.8% of their weight across 147 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
BBJP and EFA
22.8%
147 shared positions
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 155 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 32.3%·Holdings of BBJP
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 628 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 14.4%·Holdings of EFA
Reported positions cover BBJP 99%, EFA 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
EFA vs BBJP side by side
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
155
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.9% of its weight is in 8 names EFA does not hold
EFAiShares MSCI EAFE ETF
628
stock positions reported to the SEC
75.7% of its weight is in 481 names BBJP does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: BBJP has 5.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| BBJP | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 155 | 628 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 32.3% | 14.4% |
| Largest position | MUFG 6.7% | ASML 2.9% |
| Held alone | 8 positions, 0.9% | 481 positions, 75.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 98% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In BBJP | In EFA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUFGMitsubishi Corp. | 6.67% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
| TMToyota Motor Corp. | 3.99% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
| SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. | 3.02% | 0.71% | 0.71% |
| NODKNissan Motor Co. Ltd. | 3.55% | 0.68% | 0.68% |
| TOKYO ELECTRON LIMITEDTokyo Electron Ltd. | 2.72% | 0.68% | 0.68% |
| ADVANTEST CORPAdvantest Corp. | 2.64% | 0.66% | 0.66% |
| HITACHI LTDHitachi Ltd. | 2.72% | 0.66% | 0.66% |
| SONYSony Group Corp. | 2.56% | 0.62% | 0.62% |
| SUGPSuntory Beverage & Food Ltd. | 2.05% | 0.59% | 0.59% |
| MFGMizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 2.35% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in BBJP
Only in EFA
Questions people ask
Is BBJP the same as EFA?
22.8% of their weight sits in the same 147 holdings. BBJP also reports CONCORDIA FINANCIAL GROUP LTD., MINEBEA MITSUMI INC, SHIMADZU CORP, which the other does not. EFA also reports ASML, HSBC, ROCHE HOLDING AG, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between BBJP and EFA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of BBJP and 98% of EFA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, EFA or BBJP?
BBJP reports 155 stock positions and EFA reports 628. 0.9% of BBJP's weight sits in names EFA does not hold, and 75.7% of EFA's weight in names BBJP does not hold. The ten largest positions are 32.3% of BBJP and 14.4% of EFA.
How do BBJP and EFA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: BBJP has 5.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
BBJP against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.