BBJP vs EFG overlap - what they share and where they differ

BBJP and EFG share 22.4% of their weight across 76 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.

Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.

BBJP and EFG

22.4%

76 shared positions

BBJP

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 155 positions · Jul 31, 2026

Top 10: 32.3%·Holdings of BBJP

EFG

iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF

Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 340 positions · Jul 31, 2026

Top 10: 21.1%·Holdings of EFG

Reported positions cover BBJP 99%, EFG 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.

EFG vs BBJP side by side

BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

155

stock positions reported to the SEC

41.7% of its weight is in 79 names EFG does not hold

EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF

340

stock positions reported to the SEC

75.7% of its weight is in 264 names BBJP does not hold

Where each fund's weight sits

BBJP
EFG
shared with the other fundheld alonenot covered by the filing (cash, futures, bonds)

Largest sectors for both funds

Financial Services
14.0%
2.4%
Technology
2.7%
10.9%
Consumer Cyclical
7.3%
2.4%
Healthcare
1.0%
7.0%
Industrials
0.2%
1.1%

The widest gap is Financial Services: BBJP has 11.6 points more of it.

The figures side by side

BBJPEFG
Filing dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Stock positions reported155340
Weight of the ten largest32.3%21.1%
Largest positionMUFG 6.7%ASML 5.9%
Held alone79 positions, 41.7%264 positions, 75.7%
Covered by stock positions99%98%

Holdings they share

StockIn BBJPIn EFGCounted
TOKYO ELECTRON LIMITEDTokyo Electron Ltd.2.72%1.39%1.39%
ADVANTEST CORPAdvantest Corp.2.64%1.34%1.34%
HITACHI LTDHitachi Ltd.2.72%1.34%1.34%
SONYSony Group Corp.2.56%1.26%1.26%
RECRUIT HOLDINGS CO.,LTD.Recruit Holdings Co. Ltd.2.03%0.97%0.97%
KEYENCE CORPORATIONKeyence Corp.1.73%0.88%0.88%
FAST RETAILING CO., LTD.Fast Retailing Co. Ltd.1.70%0.87%0.87%
NODKNissan Motor Co. Ltd.3.55%0.84%0.84%
KIOXIA HOLDINGS CORPORATIONKioxia Holdings Corp.1.72%0.81%0.81%
MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTDMitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.1.44%0.69%0.69%

What each holds alone

The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.

Only in BBJP

MUFGMitsubishi Corp.6.67%
TMToyota Motor Corp.3.99%
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.3.02%
MFGMizuho Financial Group, Inc.2.35%
MITSUI & CO., LTD.Mitsui & Co. Ltd.1.44%
PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPPanasonic Holdings Corp.1.08%
KDDI CORPORATIONKDDI Corp.0.98%
MARUBENI CORPORATIONMarubeni Corp.0.97%
SUMITOMO CORPSumitomo Corp.0.92%
JAPAN TOBACCO INC.Japan Tobacco, Inc.0.91%

Only in EFG

ASMLASML Holding N.V.5.92%
AZNASTRAZENECA PLC2.38%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA1.94%
SAPSAP SE1.77%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE1.71%
UBS GROUP AG1.56%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC1.55%
ABB LTD1.43%
NVONOVO NORDISK A/S1.41%
AIRBUS SE1.29%

Questions people ask

Is BBJP the same as EFG?

22.4% of their weight sits in the same 76 holdings. BBJP also reports MUFG, TM, SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., which the other does not. EFG also reports ASML, AZN, COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, which the other does not.

How is the overlap between BBJP and EFG measured?

For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of BBJP and 98% of EFG, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.

Which holds more, EFG or BBJP?

BBJP reports 155 stock positions and EFG reports 340. 41.7% of BBJP's weight sits in names EFG does not hold, and 75.7% of EFG's weight in names BBJP does not hold. The ten largest positions are 32.3% of BBJP and 21.1% of EFG.

How do BBJP and EFG differ by sector?

The widest gap is Financial Services: BBJP has 11.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.

Where do the numbers come from?

From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.

Other pairs with these funds

BBJP against other funds in the table

Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs

Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.