BBJP vs URA overlap - what they share and where they differ
BBJP and URA share 3.1% of their weight across 2 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
BBJP and URA
3.1%
2 shared positions
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 155 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 32.3%·Holdings of BBJP
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 57 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 63.0%·Holdings of URA
Reported positions cover BBJP 99%, URA 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
URA vs BBJP side by side
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
155
stock positions reported to the SEC
96.4% of its weight is in 153 names URA does not hold
URAGlobal X Uranium ETF
57
stock positions reported to the SEC
95.3% of its weight is in 55 names BBJP does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: URA has 54.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| BBJP | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 155 | 57 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 32.3% | 63.0% |
| Largest position | MUFG 6.7% | CCJ 22.2% |
| Held alone | 153 positions, 96.4% | 55 positions, 95.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In BBJP | In URA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ITOCHU CORPORATIONITOCHU Corp. | 1.62% | 2.11% | 1.62% |
| MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTDMitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. | 1.44% | 2.04% | 1.44% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in BBJP
Only in URA
Questions people ask
Is BBJP the same as URA?
3.1% of their weight sits in the same 2 holdings. BBJP also reports MUFG, TM, NODK, which the other does not. URA also reports CCJ, SII, OKLO, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between BBJP and URA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of BBJP and 99% of URA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, URA or BBJP?
BBJP reports 155 stock positions and URA reports 57. 96.4% of BBJP's weight sits in names URA does not hold, and 95.3% of URA's weight in names BBJP does not hold. The ten largest positions are 32.3% of BBJP and 63.0% of URA.
How do BBJP and URA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: URA has 54.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
BBJP against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.