BBJP vs VPL overlap - what they share and where they differ
BBJP and VPL share 11.2% of their weight across 13 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
BBJP and VPL
11.2%
13 shared positions
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 165 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 32.5%·Holdings of BBJP
VPL
VANGUARD PACIFIC STOCK INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 1,355 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 23.7%·Holdings of VPL
Reported positions cover BBJP 99%, VPL 97% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VPL vs BBJP side by side
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
165
stock positions reported to the SEC
73.6% of its weight is in 152 names VPL does not hold
VPLVANGUARD PACIFIC STOCK INDEX FUND
1,355
stock positions reported to the SEC
85.8% of its weight is in 1,342 names BBJP does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: BBJP has 7.9 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| BBJP | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 165 | 1,355 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 32.5% | 23.7% |
| Largest position | MUFG 6.2% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 6.0% |
| Held alone | 152 positions, 73.6% | 1,342 positions, 85.8% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 97% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In BBJP | In VPL | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUFGMitsubishi Corp. | 6.18% | 2.56% | 2.56% |
| NODKNissan Motor Co. Ltd. | 3.60% | 2.06% | 2.06% |
| TMToyota Motor Corp. | 4.24% | 1.73% | 1.73% |
| SMFGSumitomo Mitsui Trust Group, Inc. | 3.92% | 1.59% | 1.59% |
| SONYSony Group Corp. | 2.30% | 1.02% | 1.02% |
| MFGMizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 2.04% | 0.87% | 0.87% |
| TAKTakeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. | 1.01% | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| IXORIX Corp. | 0.72% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
| HMCHonda Motor Co. Ltd. | 0.61% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
| NMRNomura Holdings, Inc. | 0.45% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in BBJP
Only in VPL
Questions people ask
Is BBJP the same as VPL?
11.2% of their weight sits in the same 13 holdings. BBJP also reports HITACHI LTD., TOKYO ELECTRON LTD., ADVANTEST CORP., which the other does not. VPL also reports SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD, SKHY, COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between BBJP and VPL measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of BBJP and 97% of VPL, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VPL or BBJP?
BBJP reports 165 stock positions and VPL reports 1,355. 73.6% of BBJP's weight sits in names VPL does not hold, and 85.8% of VPL's weight in names BBJP does not hold. The ten largest positions are 32.5% of BBJP and 23.7% of VPL.
How do BBJP and VPL differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: BBJP has 7.9 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.