CGBL vs CGGO overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGBL and CGGO share 33.1% of their weight across 34 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGBL and CGGO
33.1%
34 shared positions
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 77 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 59.3%·Holdings of CGBL
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 105 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 35.3%·Holdings of CGGO
Reported positions cover CGBL 100%, CGGO 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
CGGO vs CGBL side by side
CGBLCapital Group Core Balanced ETF
77
stock positions reported to the SEC
60.8% of its weight is in 43 names CGGO does not hold
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
105
stock positions reported to the SEC
52.2% of its weight is in 71 names CGBL does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: CGGO has 16.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGBL | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 77 | 105 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 59.3% | 35.3% |
| Largest position | CAPITAL GROUP CORE PLUS INCOME ETF 23.3% | TSM 6.6% |
| Held alone | 43 positions, 60.8% | 71 positions, 52.2% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGBL | In CGGO | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.58% | 3.70% | 3.70% |
| TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 3.49% | 6.62% | 3.49% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.79% | 3.02% | 2.79% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 2.23% | 5.69% | 2.23% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.96% | 2.04% | 1.96% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.20% |
| VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1.20% | 1.14% | 1.14% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.10% |
| BABoeing Co/The | 1.07% | 0.92% | 0.92% |
| INTCIntel Corp | 0.91% | 0.98% | 0.91% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGBL
Only in CGGO
Questions people ask
Is CGBL the same as CGGO?
33.1% of their weight sits in the same 34 holdings. CGBL also reports CAPITAL GROUP CORE PLUS INCOME ETF, CAPITAL GROUP CORE BOND ETF, WPM, which the other does not. CGGO also reports SKHY, WDC, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGBL and CGGO measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGBL and 100% of CGGO, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, CGGO or CGBL?
CGBL reports 77 stock positions and CGGO reports 105. 60.8% of CGBL's weight sits in names CGGO does not hold, and 52.2% of CGGO's weight in names CGBL does not hold. The ten largest positions are 59.3% of CGBL and 35.3% of CGGO.
How do CGBL and CGGO differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: CGGO has 16.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.