CGDV vs CGGR overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGDV and CGGR share 38.9% of their weight across 23 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGDV and CGGR
38.9%
23 shared positions
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 53 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 38.8%·Holdings of CGDV
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 88 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 46.2%·Holdings of CGGR
Reported positions cover CGDV 100%, CGGR 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
CGGR vs CGDV side by side
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
53
stock positions reported to the SEC
47.1% of its weight is in 30 names CGGR does not hold
CGGRCapital Group Growth ETF
88
stock positions reported to the SEC
52.5% of its weight is in 65 names CGDV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: CGGR has 9.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGDV | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 53 | 88 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 38.8% | 46.2% |
| Largest position | MSFT 5.8% | META 7.1% |
| Held alone | 30 positions, 47.1% | 65 positions, 52.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGDV | In CGGR | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.16% | 5.40% | 5.16% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 5.16% | 5.16% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.81% | 4.37% | 4.37% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.59% | 6.42% | 3.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 7.09% | 3.33% |
| CAPITAL GROUP CENTRAL CASH FUND | 2.02% | 1.98% | 1.98% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 1.88% | 2.69% | 1.88% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.15% | 1.81% | 1.81% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 2.36% | 1.79% | 1.79% |
| TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 2.16% | 1.48% | 1.48% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGDV
Only in CGGR
Questions people ask
Is CGDV the same as CGGR?
38.9% of their weight sits in the same 23 holdings. CGDV also reports AMAT, CSCO, RTX, which the other does not. CGGR also reports TSLA, MU, V, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGDV and CGGR measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGDV and 100% of CGGR, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, CGGR or CGDV?
CGDV reports 53 stock positions and CGGR reports 88. 47.1% of CGDV's weight sits in names CGGR does not hold, and 52.5% of CGGR's weight in names CGDV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 38.8% of CGDV and 46.2% of CGGR.
How do CGDV and CGGR differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: CGGR has 9.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.