CGDV vs CGUS overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGDV and CGUS share 66.1% of their weight across 38 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGDV and CGUS
66.1%
38 shared positions
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 53 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 38.8%·Holdings of CGDV
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 65 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 45.1%·Holdings of CGUS
Reported positions cover CGDV 100%, CGUS 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
CGUS vs CGDV side by side
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
53
stock positions reported to the SEC
17.1% of its weight is in 15 names CGUS does not hold
CGUSCapital Group Core Equity ETF
65
stock positions reported to the SEC
21.3% of its weight is in 27 names CGDV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: CGUS has 5.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGDV | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 53 | 65 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 38.8% | 45.1% |
| Largest position | MSFT 5.8% | NVDA 6.9% |
| Held alone | 15 positions, 17.1% | 27 positions, 21.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGDV | In CGUS | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.81% | 5.75% | 5.75% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 6.85% | 5.66% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.16% | 6.33% | 5.16% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.59% | 5.15% | 3.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 3.79% | 3.33% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.15% | 3.92% | 3.15% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 3.12% | 2.57% | 2.57% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 2.36% | 2.76% | 2.36% |
| TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 2.16% | 2.44% | 2.16% |
| CAPITAL GROUP CENTRAL CASH FUND | 2.02% | 2.89% | 2.02% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGDV
Only in CGUS
Questions people ask
Is CGDV the same as CGUS?
66.1% of their weight sits in the same 38 holdings. CGDV also reports UNP, CMCSA, ORCL, which the other does not. CGUS also reports BLK, APH, NFLX, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGDV and CGUS measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGDV and 100% of CGUS, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, CGUS or CGDV?
CGDV reports 53 stock positions and CGUS reports 65. 17.1% of CGDV's weight sits in names CGUS does not hold, and 21.3% of CGUS's weight in names CGDV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 38.8% of CGDV and 45.1% of CGUS.
How do CGDV and CGUS differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: CGUS has 5.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.