CGDV vs DYNF overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGDV and DYNF share 39.0% of their weight across 32 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGDV and DYNF
39.0%
32 shared positions
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 53 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 38.8%·Holdings of CGDV
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 164 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 45.7%·Holdings of DYNF
Reported positions cover CGDV 100%, DYNF 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
DYNF vs CGDV side by side
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
53
stock positions reported to the SEC
28.3% of its weight is in 21 names DYNF does not hold
DYNFiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
164
stock positions reported to the SEC
46.1% of its weight is in 132 names CGDV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Industrials: CGDV has 8.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGDV | DYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 53 | 164 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 38.8% | 45.7% |
| Largest position | MSFT 5.8% | NVDA 8.6% |
| Held alone | 21 positions, 28.3% | 132 positions, 46.1% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGDV | In DYNF | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 8.57% | 5.66% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.81% | 5.32% | 5.32% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.59% | 4.93% | 3.59% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.16% | 3.24% | 3.24% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc | 3.02% | 2.75% | 2.75% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 2.48% | 2.48% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 2.36% | 7.71% | 2.36% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 1.89% | 3.57% | 1.89% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 1.88% | 4.40% | 1.88% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 3.12% | 1.40% | 1.40% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGDV
Only in DYNF
Questions people ask
Is CGDV the same as DYNF?
39.0% of their weight sits in the same 32 holdings. CGDV also reports BTI, CARR, SBUX, which the other does not. DYNF also reports LRCX, BRK.A, JNJ, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGDV and DYNF measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGDV and 99% of DYNF, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, DYNF or CGDV?
CGDV reports 53 stock positions and DYNF reports 164. 28.3% of CGDV's weight sits in names DYNF does not hold, and 46.1% of DYNF's weight in names CGDV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 38.8% of CGDV and 45.7% of DYNF.
How do CGDV and DYNF differ by sector?
The widest gap is Industrials: CGDV has 8.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.