CGDV vs FELC overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGDV and FELC share 39.8% of their weight across 32 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGDV and FELC
39.8%
32 shared positions
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 53 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 38.7%·Holdings of CGDV
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 220 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 39.9%·Holdings of FELC
Reported positions cover CGDV 100%, FELC 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
FELC vs CGDV side by side
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
53
stock positions reported to the SEC
29.8% of its weight is in 21 names FELC does not hold
FELCFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
220
stock positions reported to the SEC
47.4% of its weight is in 188 names CGDV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: FELC has 6.9 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGDV | FELC | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 53 | 220 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 38.7% | 39.9% |
| Largest position | MSFT 5.8% | NVDA 8.0% |
| Held alone | 21 positions, 29.8% | 188 positions, 47.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGDV | In FELC | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 7.95% | 5.66% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.81% | 4.03% | 4.03% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.59% | 6.09% | 3.59% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.16% | 3.19% | 3.19% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 2.36% | 7.00% | 2.36% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 2.19% | 2.19% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 1.88% | 3.89% | 1.88% |
| JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.54% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.15% | 1.44% | 1.44% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 3.12% | 1.18% | 1.18% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGDV
Only in FELC
Questions people ask
Is CGDV the same as FELC?
39.8% of their weight sits in the same 32 holdings. CGDV also reports RCL, BTI, CARR, which the other does not. FELC also reports MU, BRK.A, TSLA, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGDV and FELC measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGDV and 99% of FELC, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, FELC or CGDV?
CGDV reports 53 stock positions and FELC reports 220. 29.8% of CGDV's weight sits in names FELC does not hold, and 47.4% of FELC's weight in names CGDV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 38.7% of CGDV and 39.9% of FELC.
How do CGDV and FELC differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: FELC has 6.9 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.