CGDV vs IUSG overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGDV and IUSG share 39.1% of their weight across 25 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGDV and IUSG
39.1%
25 shared positions
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 53 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 38.7%·Holdings of CGDV
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 388 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 56.1%·Holdings of IUSG
Reported positions cover CGDV 100%, IUSG 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IUSG vs CGDV side by side
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
53
stock positions reported to the SEC
39.9% of its weight is in 28 names IUSG does not hold
IUSGiShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
388
stock positions reported to the SEC
40.7% of its weight is in 363 names CGDV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IUSG has 23.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGDV | IUSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 53 | 388 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 38.7% | 56.1% |
| Largest position | MSFT 5.8% | NVDA 13.0% |
| Held alone | 28 positions, 39.9% | 363 positions, 40.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGDV | In IUSG | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.81% | 7.41% | 5.81% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 12.95% | 5.66% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.16% | 4.78% | 4.78% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.59% | 10.07% | 3.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 3.31% | 3.31% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.15% | 2.54% | 2.54% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 2.36% | 5.68% | 2.36% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 1.88% | 3.31% | 1.88% |
| JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.89% | 1.59% | 1.59% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 3.12% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGDV
Only in IUSG
Questions people ask
Is CGDV the same as IUSG?
39.1% of their weight sits in the same 25 holdings. CGDV also reports BTI, CARR, SBUX, which the other does not. IUSG also reports MU, AMD, BRK.A, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGDV and IUSG measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGDV and 100% of IUSG, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IUSG or CGDV?
CGDV reports 53 stock positions and IUSG reports 388. 39.9% of CGDV's weight sits in names IUSG does not hold, and 40.7% of IUSG's weight in names CGDV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 38.7% of CGDV and 56.1% of IUSG.
How do CGDV and IUSG differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IUSG has 23.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IUSG against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.