CGDV vs VV overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGDV and VV share 38.3% of their weight across 47 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGDV and VV
38.3%
47 shared positions
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 53 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 38.8%·Holdings of CGDV
VV
VANGUARD LARGE-CAP INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 426 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 38.3%·Holdings of VV
Reported positions cover CGDV 100%, VV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VV vs CGDV side by side
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
53
stock positions reported to the SEC
10.0% of its weight is in 6 names VV does not hold
VVVANGUARD LARGE-CAP INDEX FUND
426
stock positions reported to the SEC
51.3% of its weight is in 379 names CGDV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: VV has 5.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGDV | VV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 53 | 426 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 38.8% | 38.3% |
| Largest position | MSFT 5.8% | NVDA 7.3% |
| Held alone | 6 positions, 10.0% | 379 positions, 51.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGDV | In VV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 7.28% | 5.66% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.81% | 4.38% | 4.38% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.59% | 5.92% | 3.59% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.16% | 2.83% | 2.83% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 2.36% | 6.72% | 2.36% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 1.96% | 1.96% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 1.88% | 3.65% | 1.88% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.15% | 1.61% | 1.61% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 1.89% | 1.29% | 1.29% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 3.12% | 0.91% | 0.91% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGDV
Only in VV
Questions people ask
Is CGDV the same as VV?
38.3% of their weight sits in the same 47 holdings. CGDV also reports BTI, TSM, CAPITAL GROUP CENTRAL CASH FUND, which the other does not. VV also reports MU, TSLA, AMD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGDV and VV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGDV and 100% of VV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VV or CGDV?
CGDV reports 53 stock positions and VV reports 426. 10.0% of CGDV's weight sits in names VV does not hold, and 51.3% of VV's weight in names CGDV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 38.8% of CGDV and 38.3% of VV.
How do CGDV and VV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: VV has 5.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
VV against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.