CGGO vs CGGR overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGGO and CGGR share 35.9% of their weight across 33 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGGO and CGGR
35.9%
33 shared positions
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 105 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 35.3%·Holdings of CGGO
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 88 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 46.2%·Holdings of CGGR
Reported positions cover CGGO 100%, CGGR 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
CGGR vs CGGO side by side
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
105
stock positions reported to the SEC
49.8% of its weight is in 72 names CGGR does not hold
CGGRCapital Group Growth ETF
88
stock positions reported to the SEC
35.9% of its weight is in 55 names CGGO does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: CGGR has 10.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGGO | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 105 | 88 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 35.3% | 46.2% |
| Largest position | TSM 6.6% | META 7.1% |
| Held alone | 72 positions, 49.8% | 55 positions, 35.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGGO | In CGGR | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 5.69% | 4.86% | 4.86% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.70% | 5.40% | 3.70% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.02% | 6.42% | 3.02% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.04% | 4.37% | 2.04% |
| CAPITAL GROUP CENTRAL CASH FUND | 1.66% | 1.98% | 1.66% |
| SKHYSK hynix Inc | 5.32% | 1.63% | 1.63% |
| TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 6.62% | 1.48% | 1.48% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 1.39% | 5.16% | 1.39% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.37% | 7.09% | 1.37% |
| VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1.14% | 1.56% | 1.14% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGGO
Only in CGGR
Questions people ask
Is CGGO the same as CGGR?
35.9% of their weight sits in the same 33 holdings. CGGO also reports WDC, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD, AON, which the other does not. CGGR also reports TSLA, NFLX, ISRG, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGGO and CGGR measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGGO and 100% of CGGR, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, CGGR or CGGO?
CGGO reports 105 stock positions and CGGR reports 88. 49.8% of CGGO's weight sits in names CGGR does not hold, and 35.9% of CGGR's weight in names CGGO does not hold. The ten largest positions are 35.3% of CGGO and 46.2% of CGGR.
How do CGGO and CGGR differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: CGGR has 10.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.