CGGO vs CHAT overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGGO and CHAT share 27.7% of their weight across 13 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGGO and CHAT
27.7%
13 shared positions
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 105 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 35.3%·Holdings of CGGO
CHAT
Roundhill Generative Ai & Technology ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 40 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 46.1%·Holdings of CHAT
Reported positions cover CGGO 100%, CHAT 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
CHAT vs CGGO side by side
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
105
stock positions reported to the SEC
68.3% of its weight is in 92 names CHAT does not hold
CHATRoundhill Generative Ai & Technology ETF
40
stock positions reported to the SEC
52.3% of its weight is in 27 names CGGO does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: CHAT has 25.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGGO | CHAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 105 | 40 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 35.3% | 46.1% |
| Largest position | TSM 6.6% | GOOGL 7.2% |
| Held alone | 92 positions, 68.3% | 27 positions, 52.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGGO | In CHAT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| SKHYSK hynix Inc | 5.32% | 4.36% | 4.36% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 5.69% | 4.08% | 4.08% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.70% | 3.89% | 3.70% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.02% | 7.16% | 3.02% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD | 2.41% | 3.62% | 2.41% |
| ASMLASML Holding NV | 2.34% | 2.69% | 2.34% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.04% | 3.58% | 2.04% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 1.39% | 6.95% | 1.39% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.37% | 2.98% | 1.37% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp | 2.45% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGGO
Only in CHAT
Questions people ask
Is CGGO the same as CHAT?
27.7% of their weight sits in the same 13 holdings. CGGO also reports TSM, CAPITAL GROUP CENTRAL CASH FUND, AON, which the other does not. CHAT also reports AMD, SOFTBANK GROUP CORP, ANET, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGGO and CHAT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGGO and 99% of CHAT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, CHAT or CGGO?
CGGO reports 105 stock positions and CHAT reports 40. 68.3% of CGGO's weight sits in names CHAT does not hold, and 52.3% of CHAT's weight in names CGGO does not hold. The ten largest positions are 35.3% of CGGO and 46.1% of CHAT.
How do CGGO and CHAT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: CHAT has 25.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.