CGGO vs IXN overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGGO and IXN share 27.5% of their weight across 18 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGGO and IXN
27.5%
18 shared positions
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 105 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 35.3%·Holdings of CGGO
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 126 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 60.0%·Holdings of IXN
Reported positions cover CGGO 100%, IXN 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IXN vs CGGO side by side
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
105
stock positions reported to the SEC
64.4% of its weight is in 87 names IXN does not hold
IXNiShares Global Tech ETF
126
stock positions reported to the SEC
40.5% of its weight is in 108 names CGGO does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IXN has 41.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGGO | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 105 | 126 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 35.3% | 60.0% |
| Largest position | TSM 6.6% | NVDA 13.0% |
| Held alone | 87 positions, 64.4% | 108 positions, 40.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGGO | In IXN | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 6.62% | 5.08% | 5.08% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 5.69% | 4.63% | 4.63% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.70% | 4.78% | 3.70% |
| SKHYSK hynix Inc | 5.32% | 3.35% | 3.35% |
| ASMLASML Holding NV | 2.34% | 2.73% | 2.34% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.04% | 7.41% | 2.04% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 1.39% | 12.96% | 1.39% |
| INTCIntel Corp | 0.98% | 2.35% | 0.98% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp | 2.45% | 0.78% | 0.78% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 0.75% | 11.36% | 0.75% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGGO
Only in IXN
Questions people ask
Is CGGO the same as IXN?
27.5% of their weight sits in the same 18 holdings. CGGO also reports GOOGL, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD, CAPITAL GROUP CENTRAL CASH FUND, which the other does not. IXN also reports SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., AMD, AMAT, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGGO and IXN measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGGO and 100% of IXN, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IXN or CGGO?
CGGO reports 105 stock positions and IXN reports 126. 64.4% of CGGO's weight sits in names IXN does not hold, and 40.5% of IXN's weight in names CGGO does not hold. The ten largest positions are 35.3% of CGGO and 60.0% of IXN.
How do CGGO and IXN differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IXN has 41.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.