CGGO vs QQQM overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGGO and QQQM share 26.2% of their weight across 24 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGGO and QQQM
26.2%
24 shared positions
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 105 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 35.3%·Holdings of CGGO
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 100 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 50.3%·Holdings of QQQM
Reported positions cover CGGO 100%, QQQM 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
QQQM vs CGGO side by side
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
105
stock positions reported to the SEC
66.3% of its weight is in 81 names QQQM does not hold
QQQMInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
100
stock positions reported to the SEC
43.6% of its weight is in 76 names CGGO does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: QQQM has 26.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGGO | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 105 | 100 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 35.3% | 50.3% |
| Largest position | TSM 6.6% | NVDA 8.1% |
| Held alone | 81 positions, 66.3% | 76 positions, 43.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGGO | In QQQM | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 5.69% | 4.78% | 4.78% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.70% | 3.36% | 3.36% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.02% | 6.75% | 3.02% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.04% | 5.30% | 2.04% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 1.39% | 8.13% | 1.39% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.37% | 2.96% | 1.37% |
| INTCIntel Corp | 0.98% | 2.51% | 0.98% |
| APPAppLovin Corp | 0.81% | 0.82% | 0.81% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp | 2.45% | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 0.75% | 7.26% | 0.75% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGGO
Only in QQQM
Questions people ask
Is CGGO the same as QQQM?
26.2% of their weight sits in the same 24 holdings. CGGO also reports TSM, SKHY, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD, which the other does not. QQQM also reports AMD, TSLA, WMT, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGGO and QQQM measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGGO and 100% of QQQM, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, QQQM or CGGO?
CGGO reports 105 stock positions and QQQM reports 100. 66.3% of CGGO's weight sits in names QQQM does not hold, and 43.6% of QQQM's weight in names CGGO does not hold. The ten largest positions are 35.3% of CGGO and 50.3% of QQQM.
How do CGGO and QQQM differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: QQQM has 26.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
QQQM against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.