CGGO vs REMX overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGGO and REMX share 0.7% of their weight across 1 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGGO and REMX
0.7%
1 shared positions
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 105 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 35.3%·Holdings of CGGO
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 30 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 59.3%·Holdings of REMX
Reported positions cover CGGO 100%, REMX 97% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
REMX vs CGGO side by side
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
105
stock positions reported to the SEC
99.1% of its weight is in 104 names REMX does not hold
REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
30
stock positions reported to the SEC
90.0% of its weight is in 29 names CGGO does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: CGGO has 43.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGGO | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 105 | 30 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 35.3% | 59.3% |
| Largest position | TSM 6.6% | XIAMEN TUNGSTEN CO LTD 7.0% |
| Held alone | 104 positions, 99.1% | 29 positions, 90.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 97% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGGO | In REMX | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| LYNAS RARE EARTHS LTD | 0.73% | 6.56% | 0.73% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGGO
Only in REMX
Questions people ask
Is CGGO the same as REMX?
0.7% of their weight sits in the same 1 holdings. CGGO also reports TSM, MU, SKHY, which the other does not. REMX also reports XIAMEN TUNGSTEN CO LTD, ALB, CHINA NORTHERN RARE EARTH GROUP HIGH-TECH CO LTD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGGO and REMX measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGGO and 97% of REMX, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, REMX or CGGO?
CGGO reports 105 stock positions and REMX reports 30. 99.1% of CGGO's weight sits in names REMX does not hold, and 90.0% of REMX's weight in names CGGO does not hold. The ten largest positions are 35.3% of CGGO and 59.3% of REMX.
How do CGGO and REMX differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: CGGO has 43.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.