CGGR vs IVW overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGGR and IVW share 45.6% of their weight across 37 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGGR and IVW
45.6%
37 shared positions
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 88 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 46.2%·Holdings of CGGR
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 145 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 59.0%·Holdings of IVW
Reported positions cover CGGR 100%, IVW 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IVW vs CGGR side by side
CGGRCapital Group Growth ETF
88
stock positions reported to the SEC
33.8% of its weight is in 51 names IVW does not hold
IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
145
stock positions reported to the SEC
30.6% of its weight is in 108 names CGGR does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IVW has 16.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGGR | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 88 | 145 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 46.2% | 59.0% |
| Largest position | META 7.1% | NVDA 13.7% |
| Held alone | 51 positions, 33.8% | 108 positions, 30.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGGR | In IVW | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 6.42% | 10.60% | 6.42% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 5.16% | 13.65% | 5.16% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.40% | 5.04% | 5.04% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.37% | 7.80% | 4.37% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 4.86% | 3.67% | 3.67% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 7.09% | 3.48% | 3.48% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 2.69% | 3.48% | 2.69% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 5.85% | 2.07% | 2.07% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 1.81% | 2.67% | 1.81% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 1.79% | 5.98% | 1.79% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGGR
Only in IVW
Questions people ask
Is CGGR the same as IVW?
45.6% of their weight sits in the same 37 holdings. CGGR also reports CAPITAL GROUP CENTRAL CASH FUND, NET, SHOP, which the other does not. IVW also reports AMD, BRK.A, JPM, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGGR and IVW measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGGR and 100% of IVW, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IVW or CGGR?
CGGR reports 88 stock positions and IVW reports 145. 33.8% of CGGR's weight sits in names IVW does not hold, and 30.6% of IVW's weight in names CGGR does not hold. The ten largest positions are 46.2% of CGGR and 59.0% of IVW.
How do CGGR and IVW differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IVW has 16.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IVW against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.