CHAT vs IVW overlap - what they share and where they differ
CHAT and IVW share 32.8% of their weight across 16 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CHAT and IVW
32.8%
16 shared positions
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 47 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 39.3%·Holdings of CHAT
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 145 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 59.0%·Holdings of IVW
Reported positions cover CHAT 100%, IVW 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IVW vs CHAT side by side
CHATRoundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
47
stock positions reported to the SEC
56.2% of its weight is in 31 names IVW does not hold
IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
145
stock positions reported to the SEC
46.8% of its weight is in 129 names CHAT does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: IVW has 8.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CHAT | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 47 | 145 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 39.3% | 59.0% |
| Largest position | NVDA 6.4% | NVDA 13.7% |
| Held alone | 31 positions, 56.2% | 129 positions, 46.8% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CHAT | In IVW | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 6.43% | 13.65% | 6.43% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.92% | 10.60% | 5.92% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.31% | 5.04% | 4.31% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.22% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 2.81% | 3.48% | 2.81% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.78% | 7.80% | 2.78% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.39% | 2.67% | 2.67% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.96% | 3.48% | 1.96% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1.51% | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc | 2.17% | 0.49% | 0.49% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CHAT
Only in IVW
Questions people ask
Is CHAT the same as IVW?
32.8% of their weight sits in the same 16 holdings. CHAT also reports SKHY, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., NBIS, which the other does not. IVW also reports AAPL, LLY, BRK.A, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CHAT and IVW measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CHAT and 100% of IVW, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IVW or CHAT?
CHAT reports 47 stock positions and IVW reports 145. 56.2% of CHAT's weight sits in names IVW does not hold, and 46.8% of IVW's weight in names CHAT does not hold. The ten largest positions are 39.3% of CHAT and 59.0% of IVW.
How do CHAT and IVW differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: IVW has 8.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IVW against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.