CHAT vs WGMI overlap - what they share and where they differ
CHAT and WGMI share 5.5% of their weight across 4 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CHAT and WGMI
5.5%
4 shared positions
CHAT
Roundhill Generative Ai & Technology ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 40 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 46.1%·Holdings of CHAT
WGMI
Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 27 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 77.1%·Holdings of WGMI
Reported positions cover CHAT 99%, WGMI 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
WGMI vs CHAT side by side
CHATRoundhill Generative Ai & Technology ETF
40
stock positions reported to the SEC
85.5% of its weight is in 36 names WGMI does not hold
WGMIValkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF
27
stock positions reported to the SEC
94.0% of its weight is in 23 names CHAT does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: WGMI has 29.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CHAT | WGMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 40 | 27 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 46.1% | 77.1% |
| Largest position | GOOGL 7.2% | CIFR 18.1% |
| Held alone | 36 positions, 85.5% | 23 positions, 94.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CHAT | In WGMI | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 6.95% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
| NBISNebius Group NV | 2.06% | 1.99% | 1.99% |
| CRWVCoreWeave Inc | 1.85% | 0.87% | 0.87% |
| TSMC | 2.95% | 0.66% | 0.66% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CHAT
Only in WGMI
Questions people ask
Is CHAT the same as WGMI?
5.5% of their weight sits in the same 4 holdings. CHAT also reports GOOGL, AMD, SKHY, which the other does not. WGMI also reports CIFR, HUT, KEEL, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CHAT and WGMI measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of CHAT and 100% of WGMI, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, WGMI or CHAT?
CHAT reports 40 stock positions and WGMI reports 27. 85.5% of CHAT's weight sits in names WGMI does not hold, and 94.0% of WGMI's weight in names CHAT does not hold. The ten largest positions are 46.1% of CHAT and 77.1% of WGMI.
How do CHAT and WGMI differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: WGMI has 29.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.