CIBR vs FTEC overlap - what they share and where they differ
CIBR and FTEC share 15.0% of their weight across 29 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CIBR and FTEC
15.0%
29 shared positions
CIBR
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 42 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 58.1%·Holdings of CIBR
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 278 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 62.2%·Holdings of FTEC
Reported positions cover CIBR 100%, FTEC 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
FTEC vs CIBR side by side
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
42
stock positions reported to the SEC
14.9% of its weight is in 13 names FTEC does not hold
FTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
278
stock positions reported to the SEC
75.6% of its weight is in 249 names CIBR does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: FTEC has 1.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CIBR | FTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 42 | 278 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 58.1% | 62.2% |
| Largest position | PANW 9.6% | NVDA 17.1% |
| Held alone | 13 positions, 14.9% | 249 positions, 75.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CIBR | In FTEC | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 6.72% | 4.20% | 4.20% |
| CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INC | 7.75% | 1.92% | 1.92% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 1.65% | 10.93% | 1.65% |
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 9.62% | 1.17% | 1.17% |
| IBMINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.88% | 0.87% | 0.87% |
| ANETARISTA NETWORKS INC | 2.12% | 0.84% | 0.84% |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 8.29% | 0.83% | 0.83% |
| FTNTFORTINET INC | 8.85% | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| ACNACCENTURE PLC | 1.32% | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| NETCLOUDFLARE INC | 4.03% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CIBR
Only in FTEC
Questions people ask
Is CIBR the same as FTEC?
15.0% of their weight sits in the same 29 holdings. CIBR also reports CHKP, GOOGL, THALES SA, which the other does not. FTEC also reports NVDA, AAPL, MU, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CIBR and FTEC measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CIBR and 100% of FTEC, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, FTEC or CIBR?
CIBR reports 42 stock positions and FTEC reports 278. 14.9% of CIBR's weight sits in names FTEC does not hold, and 75.6% of FTEC's weight in names CIBR does not hold. The ten largest positions are 58.1% of CIBR and 62.2% of FTEC.
How do CIBR and FTEC differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: FTEC has 1.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
FTEC against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.