CIBR vs FXL overlap - what they share and where they differ
CIBR and FXL share 16.0% of their weight across 19 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CIBR and FXL
16.0%
19 shared positions
CIBR
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 42 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 58.1%·Holdings of CIBR
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 110 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 18.1%·Holdings of FXL
Reported positions cover CIBR 100%, FXL 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
FXL vs CIBR side by side
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
42
stock positions reported to the SEC
35.4% of its weight is in 23 names FXL does not hold
FXLFirst Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
110
stock positions reported to the SEC
83.5% of its weight is in 91 names CIBR does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: CIBR has 4.0 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CIBR | FXL | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 42 | 110 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 58.1% | 18.1% |
| Largest position | PANW 9.6% | CTSH 2.4% |
| Held alone | 23 positions, 35.4% | 91 positions, 83.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CIBR | In FXL | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDOSLEIDOS HOLDINGS INC | 1.60% | 1.86% | 1.60% |
| FTNTFORTINET INC | 8.85% | 1.40% | 1.40% |
| DDOGDATADOG INC | 2.09% | 1.36% | 1.36% |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 8.29% | 1.32% | 1.32% |
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 9.62% | 1.29% | 1.29% |
| NTAPNETAPP INC | 1.76% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC | 1.87% | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| SAICSCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP | 0.83% | 1.05% | 0.83% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 1.65% | 0.82% | 0.82% |
| ESTCELASTIC NV | 0.97% | 0.76% | 0.76% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CIBR
Only in FXL
Questions people ask
Is CIBR the same as FXL?
16.0% of their weight sits in the same 19 holdings. CIBR also reports CSCO, OKTA, ZS, which the other does not. FXL also reports CTSH, EPAM, PTC, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CIBR and FXL measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CIBR and 100% of FXL, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, FXL or CIBR?
CIBR reports 42 stock positions and FXL reports 110. 35.4% of CIBR's weight sits in names FXL does not hold, and 83.5% of FXL's weight in names CIBR does not hold. The ten largest positions are 58.1% of CIBR and 18.1% of FXL.
How do CIBR and FXL differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: CIBR has 4.0 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.