CIBR vs IGM overlap - what they share and where they differ
CIBR and IGM share 18.6% of their weight across 32 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CIBR and IGM
18.6%
32 shared positions
CIBR
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 42 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 58.1%·Holdings of CIBR
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 273 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 58.1%·Holdings of IGM
Reported positions cover CIBR 100%, IGM 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IGM vs CIBR side by side
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
42
stock positions reported to the SEC
12.6% of its weight is in 10 names IGM does not hold
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
273
stock positions reported to the SEC
68.5% of its weight is in 241 names CIBR does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Industrials: CIBR has 1.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CIBR | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 42 | 273 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 58.1% | 58.1% |
| Largest position | PANW 9.6% | GOOGL 8.0% |
| Held alone | 10 positions, 12.6% | 241 positions, 68.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CIBR | In IGM | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 6.72% | 7.60% | 6.72% |
| CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INC | 7.75% | 2.02% | 2.02% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC | 1.87% | 7.98% | 1.87% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 1.65% | 7.49% | 1.65% |
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 9.62% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
| IBMINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.88% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 8.29% | 0.85% | 0.85% |
| ANETARISTA NETWORKS INC | 2.12% | 0.76% | 0.76% |
| FTNTFORTINET INC | 8.85% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
| DDOGDATADOG INC | 2.09% | 0.38% | 0.38% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CIBR
Only in IGM
Questions people ask
Is CIBR the same as IGM?
18.6% of their weight sits in the same 32 holdings. CIBR also reports FROG, CHKP, THALES SA, which the other does not. IGM also reports NVDA, AAPL, MU, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CIBR and IGM measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CIBR and 100% of IGM, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IGM or CIBR?
CIBR reports 42 stock positions and IGM reports 273. 12.6% of CIBR's weight sits in names IGM does not hold, and 68.5% of IGM's weight in names CIBR does not hold. The ten largest positions are 58.1% of CIBR and 58.1% of IGM.
How do CIBR and IGM differ by sector?
The widest gap is Industrials: CIBR has 1.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.