CIBR vs IGV overlap - what they share and where they differ
CIBR and IGV share 28.0% of their weight across 18 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CIBR and IGV
28.0%
18 shared positions
CIBR
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 42 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 58.1%·Holdings of CIBR
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 107 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 60.7%·Holdings of IGV
Reported positions cover CIBR 100%, IGV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IGV vs CIBR side by side
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
42
stock positions reported to the SEC
51.1% of its weight is in 24 names IGV does not hold
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
107
stock positions reported to the SEC
63.6% of its weight is in 89 names CIBR does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Healthcare: IGV has 1.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CIBR | IGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 42 | 107 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 58.1% | 60.7% |
| Largest position | PANW 9.6% | PANW 10.4% |
| Held alone | 24 positions, 51.1% | 89 positions, 63.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CIBR | In IGV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 9.62% | 10.37% | 9.62% |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 8.29% | 7.28% | 7.28% |
| FTNTFORTINET INC | 8.85% | 3.62% | 3.62% |
| DDOGDATADOG INC | 2.09% | 3.26% | 2.09% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 1.65% | 8.07% | 1.65% |
| ZSZSCALER INC | 3.04% | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| GENGEN DIGITAL INC | 2.14% | 0.52% | 0.52% |
| DTDYNATRACE INC | 2.05% | 0.49% | 0.49% |
| RBRKRUBRIK INC | 2.67% | 0.49% | 0.49% |
| BBBLACKBERRY LTD | 1.55% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CIBR
Only in IGV
Questions people ask
Is CIBR the same as IGV?
28.0% of their weight sits in the same 18 holdings. CIBR also reports CSCO, AVGO, NET, which the other does not. IGV also reports PLTR, ORCL, CRM, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CIBR and IGV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CIBR and 100% of IGV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IGV or CIBR?
CIBR reports 42 stock positions and IGV reports 107. 51.1% of CIBR's weight sits in names IGV does not hold, and 63.6% of IGV's weight in names CIBR does not hold. The ten largest positions are 58.1% of CIBR and 60.7% of IGV.
How do CIBR and IGV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Healthcare: IGV has 1.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.