CIBR vs VGT overlap - what they share and where they differ
CIBR and VGT share 14.4% of their weight across 29 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CIBR and VGT
14.4%
29 shared positions
CIBR
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 42 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 58.1%·Holdings of CIBR
VGT
VANGUARD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 286 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 59.4%·Holdings of VGT
Reported positions cover CIBR 100%, VGT 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VGT vs CIBR side by side
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
42
stock positions reported to the SEC
14.9% of its weight is in 13 names VGT does not hold
VGTVANGUARD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDEX FUND
286
stock positions reported to the SEC
77.7% of its weight is in 257 names CIBR does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Healthcare: VGT has 1.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CIBR | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 42 | 286 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 58.1% | 59.4% |
| Largest position | PANW 9.6% | NVDA 16.8% |
| Held alone | 13 positions, 14.9% | 257 positions, 77.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CIBR | In VGT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 6.72% | 4.21% | 4.21% |
| CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INC | 7.75% | 1.85% | 1.85% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 1.65% | 9.46% | 1.65% |
| IBMINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.88% | 1.08% | 1.08% |
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 9.62% | 0.92% | 0.92% |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 8.29% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| ANETARISTA NETWORKS INC | 2.12% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| ACNACCENTURE PLC | 1.32% | 0.47% | 0.47% |
| FTNTFORTINET INC | 8.85% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
| DDOGDATADOG INC | 2.09% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CIBR
Only in VGT
Questions people ask
Is CIBR the same as VGT?
14.4% of their weight sits in the same 29 holdings. CIBR also reports CHKP, GOOGL, THALES SA, which the other does not. VGT also reports NVDA, AAPL, MU, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CIBR and VGT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CIBR and 100% of VGT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VGT or CIBR?
CIBR reports 42 stock positions and VGT reports 286. 14.9% of CIBR's weight sits in names VGT does not hold, and 77.7% of VGT's weight in names CIBR does not hold. The ten largest positions are 58.1% of CIBR and 59.4% of VGT.
How do CIBR and VGT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Healthcare: VGT has 1.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
VGT against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.