COPX vs EFV overlap - what they share and where they differ
COPX and EFV share 3.1% of their weight across 5 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
COPX and EFV
3.1%
5 shared positions
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 39 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 53.3%·Holdings of COPX
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 382 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 20.8%·Holdings of EFV
Reported positions cover COPX 100%, EFV 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
EFV vs COPX side by side
COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF
39
stock positions reported to the SEC
78.1% of its weight is in 34 names EFV does not hold
EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
382
stock positions reported to the SEC
94.9% of its weight is in 377 names COPX does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: COPX has 24.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| COPX | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 39 | 382 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 53.3% | 20.8% |
| Largest position | LUNDIN MINING CORPORATION 6.1% | HSBC 2.8% |
| Held alone | 34 positions, 78.1% | 377 positions, 94.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 98% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In COPX | In EFV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 4.91% | 1.76% | 1.76% |
| GLENCORE PLC | 5.99% | 0.68% | 0.68% |
| NODKNittetsu Mining Co., Ltd. | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.46% |
| SUMITOMO METAL MINING CO., LTD. | 5.97% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| BOLIDEN AB | 4.33% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in COPX
Only in EFV
Questions people ask
Is COPX the same as EFV?
3.1% of their weight sits in the same 5 holdings. COPX also reports LUNDIN MINING CORPORATION, KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA, FCX, which the other does not. EFV also reports HSBC, MUFG, ROCHE HOLDING AG, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between COPX and EFV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of COPX and 98% of EFV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, EFV or COPX?
COPX reports 39 stock positions and EFV reports 382. 78.1% of COPX's weight sits in names EFV does not hold, and 94.9% of EFV's weight in names COPX does not hold. The ten largest positions are 53.3% of COPX and 20.8% of EFV.
How do COPX and EFV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: COPX has 24.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.