COPX vs EWA overlap - what they share and where they differ
COPX and EWA share 6.5% of their weight across 2 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
COPX and EWA
6.5%
2 shared positions
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 40 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 50.3%·Holdings of COPX
EWA
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Reported positions cover 92% of the fund, 41 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 63.9%·Holdings of EWA
Reported positions cover COPX 100%, EWA 92% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
EWA vs COPX side by side
COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF
40
stock positions reported to the SEC
90.6% of its weight is in 38 names EWA does not hold
EWAiShares MSCI Australia ETF
41
stock positions reported to the SEC
75.2% of its weight is in 39 names COPX does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: COPX has 11.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| COPX | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 40 | 41 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 50.3% | 63.9% |
| Largest position | BHP 5.5% | BHP 15.9% |
| Held alone | 38 positions, 90.6% | 39 positions, 75.2% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 92% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In COPX | In EWA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 5.48% | 15.91% | 5.48% |
| SUGPSumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. | 3.84% | 0.97% | 0.97% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in COPX
Only in EWA
Questions people ask
Is COPX the same as EWA?
6.5% of their weight sits in the same 2 holdings. COPX also reports TECK, HBM, SCCO, which the other does not. EWA also reports COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED, WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between COPX and EWA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of COPX and 92% of EWA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, EWA or COPX?
COPX reports 40 stock positions and EWA reports 41. 90.6% of COPX's weight sits in names EWA does not hold, and 75.2% of EWA's weight in names COPX does not hold. The ten largest positions are 50.3% of COPX and 63.9% of EWA.
How do COPX and EWA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: COPX has 11.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.