COPX vs FNDF overlap - what they share and where they differ
COPX and FNDF share 4.7% of their weight across 11 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
COPX and FNDF
4.7%
11 shared positions
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 40 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 50.3%·Holdings of COPX
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 819 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 17.7%·Holdings of FNDF
Reported positions cover COPX 100%, FNDF 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
FNDF vs COPX side by side
COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF
40
stock positions reported to the SEC
56.1% of its weight is in 29 names FNDF does not hold
FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
819
stock positions reported to the SEC
92.7% of its weight is in 808 names COPX does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: COPX has 26.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| COPX | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 40 | 819 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 50.3% | 17.7% |
| Largest position | BHP 5.5% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 5.5% |
| Held alone | 29 positions, 56.1% | 808 positions, 92.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 98% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In COPX | In FNDF | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 5.48% | 1.22% | 1.22% |
| GLENCORE PLC | 5.02% | 1.22% | 1.22% |
| SUGPSumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. | 3.84% | 1.21% | 1.21% |
| NODKNittetsu Mining Co., Ltd. | 0.46% | 1.04% | 0.46% |
| TECKTeck Resources Limited | 5.39% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| BOLIDEN AB | 4.35% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTD. | 5.05% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| AURUBIS AG | 3.04% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
| MITSUBISHI MATERIALS CORPMITSUBISHI MATERIALS CORPORATION | 1.87% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC | 5.00% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in COPX
Only in FNDF
Questions people ask
Is COPX the same as FNDF?
4.7% of their weight sits in the same 11 holdings. COPX also reports HBM, SCCO, FCX, which the other does not. FNDF also reports SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SHEL, TTE, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between COPX and FNDF measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of COPX and 98% of FNDF, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, FNDF or COPX?
COPX reports 40 stock positions and FNDF reports 819. 56.1% of COPX's weight sits in names FNDF does not hold, and 92.7% of FNDF's weight in names COPX does not hold. The ten largest positions are 50.3% of COPX and 17.7% of FNDF.
How do COPX and FNDF differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: COPX has 26.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.