COPX vs PICK overlap - what they share and where they differ
COPX and PICK share 30.7% of their weight across 35 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
COPX and PICK
30.7%
35 shared positions
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 40 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 50.3%·Holdings of COPX
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 235 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 49.4%·Holdings of PICK
Reported positions cover COPX 100%, PICK 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
PICK vs COPX side by side
COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF
40
stock positions reported to the SEC
4.8% of its weight is in 5 names PICK does not hold
PICKiShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
235
stock positions reported to the SEC
57.4% of its weight is in 200 names COPX does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: PICK has 13.9 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| COPX | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 40 | 235 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 50.3% | 49.4% |
| Largest position | BHP 5.5% | BHP 13.8% |
| Held alone | 5 positions, 4.8% | 200 positions, 57.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In COPX | In PICK | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 5.48% | 13.81% | 5.48% |
| FCXFREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. | 4.76% | 6.30% | 4.76% |
| GLENCORE PLC | 5.02% | 4.34% | 4.34% |
| ZIJIN MINING GROUP COMPANY LIMITED | 4.54% | 1.96% | 1.96% |
| TECKTeck Resources Limited | 5.39% | 1.80% | 1.80% |
| FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTD. | 5.05% | 1.32% | 1.32% |
| SCCOSOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION | 5.08% | 1.12% | 1.12% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC | 5.00% | 1.07% | 1.07% |
| LUNDIN MINING CORPORATION | 4.29% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| SUGPSumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. | 3.84% | 1.01% | 1.01% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in COPX
Only in PICK
Questions people ask
Is COPX the same as PICK?
30.7% of their weight sits in the same 35 holdings. COPX also reports CHINA GOLD INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES CORP. LTD., WANGUO GOLD GROUP LTD, FARADAY COPPER CORP, which the other does not. PICK also reports RIO, ANGLO AMERICAN PLC, NUE, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between COPX and PICK measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of COPX and 99% of PICK, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, PICK or COPX?
COPX reports 40 stock positions and PICK reports 235. 4.8% of COPX's weight sits in names PICK does not hold, and 57.4% of PICK's weight in names COPX does not hold. The ten largest positions are 50.3% of COPX and 49.4% of PICK.
How do COPX and PICK differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: PICK has 13.9 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.