COWZ vs ITB overlap - what they share and where they differ
COWZ and ITB share 3.9% of their weight across 4 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
COWZ and ITB
3.9%
4 shared positions
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 100 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 20.4%·Holdings of COWZ
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 44 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 64.4%·Holdings of ITB
Reported positions cover COWZ 100%, ITB 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
ITB vs COWZ side by side
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
100
stock positions reported to the SEC
95.9% of its weight is in 96 names ITB does not hold
ITBiShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
44
stock positions reported to the SEC
63.4% of its weight is in 40 names COWZ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Industrials: ITB has 66.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| COWZ | ITB | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 100 | 44 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 20.4% | 64.4% |
| Largest position | BKNG 2.2% | DHI 15.7% |
| Held alone | 96 positions, 95.9% | 40 positions, 63.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In COWZ | In ITB | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| LOWLowe's Cos Inc | 1.89% | 4.08% | 1.89% |
| DHIDR Horton Inc | 1.03% | 15.70% | 1.03% |
| PHMPulteGroup Inc | 0.59% | 9.55% | 0.59% |
| NVRNVR Inc | 0.37% | 6.72% | 0.37% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in COWZ
Only in ITB
Questions people ask
Is COWZ the same as ITB?
3.9% of their weight sits in the same 4 holdings. COWZ also reports BKNG, BMY, HCA, which the other does not. ITB also reports LEN, TOL, SHW, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between COWZ and ITB measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of COWZ and 99% of ITB, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, ITB or COWZ?
COWZ reports 100 stock positions and ITB reports 44. 95.9% of COWZ's weight sits in names ITB does not hold, and 63.4% of ITB's weight in names COWZ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 20.4% of COWZ and 64.4% of ITB.
How do COWZ and ITB differ by sector?
The widest gap is Industrials: ITB has 66.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.