COWZ vs VFLO overlap - what they share and where they differ
COWZ and VFLO share 34.6% of their weight across 29 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
COWZ and VFLO
34.6%
29 shared positions
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 100 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 21.1%·Holdings of COWZ
VFLO
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 50 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 30.8%·Holdings of VFLO
Reported positions cover COWZ 100%, VFLO 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VFLO vs COWZ side by side
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
100
stock positions reported to the SEC
65.2% of its weight is in 71 names VFLO does not hold
VFLOVictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
50
stock positions reported to the SEC
38.5% of its weight is in 21 names COWZ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: COWZ has 16.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| COWZ | VFLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 100 | 50 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 21.1% | 30.8% |
| Largest position | QCOM 2.7% | DVN 3.5% |
| Held alone | 71 positions, 65.2% | 21 positions, 38.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In COWZ | In VFLO | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| COPConocoPhillips | 2.17% | 2.11% | 2.11% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 2.00% | 2.67% | 2.00% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc | 1.98% | 2.35% | 1.98% |
| NEMNewmont Corp | 1.93% | 3.01% | 1.93% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings Inc | 1.87% | 2.73% | 1.87% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.78% |
| TMUST-Mobile US Inc | 1.78% | 2.26% | 1.78% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc | 1.76% | 2.90% | 1.76% |
| ADBEAdobe Inc | 1.75% | 3.37% | 1.75% |
| INTUIntuit Inc | 1.63% | 2.87% | 1.63% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in COWZ
Only in VFLO
Questions people ask
Is COWZ the same as VFLO?
34.6% of their weight sits in the same 29 holdings. COWZ also reports QCOM, MO, CVS, which the other does not. VFLO also reports SNDK, CDE, MRK, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between COWZ and VFLO measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of COWZ and 100% of VFLO, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VFLO or COWZ?
COWZ reports 100 stock positions and VFLO reports 50. 65.2% of COWZ's weight sits in names VFLO does not hold, and 38.5% of VFLO's weight in names COWZ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 21.1% of COWZ and 30.8% of VFLO.
How do COWZ and VFLO differ by sector?
The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: COWZ has 16.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.