CQQQ vs MCHI overlap - what they share and where they differ
CQQQ and MCHI share 6.2% of their weight across 34 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CQQQ and MCHI
6.2%
34 shared positions
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 168 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 51.1%·Holdings of CQQQ
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
Reported positions cover 96% of the fund, 515 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 41.3%·Holdings of MCHI
Reported positions cover CQQQ 100%, MCHI 96% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
MCHI vs CQQQ side by side
CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
168
stock positions reported to the SEC
62.4% of its weight is in 134 names MCHI does not hold
MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF
515
stock positions reported to the SEC
89.4% of its weight is in 481 names CQQQ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: CQQQ has 5.9 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CQQQ | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 168 | 515 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 51.1% | 41.3% |
| Largest position | MEITUAN 8.6% | TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED 13.2% |
| Held alone | 134 positions, 62.4% | 481 positions, 89.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 96% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CQQQ | In MCHI | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MEITUAN | 8.59% | 1.84% | 1.84% |
| BIDUBaidu, Inc. | 6.85% | 1.44% | 1.44% |
| INHDInnoScience (Suzhou) Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | 0.85% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY | 4.28% | 0.57% | 0.57% |
| GDSGDS Holdings Ltd. | 1.53% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
| BILIBilibili Inc. | 2.20% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD. | 1.39% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
| HORIZON ROBOTICS | 2.98% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| SHENGYI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. | 0.67% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
| KCKingsoft Corp. Ltd. | 1.03% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CQQQ
Only in MCHI
Questions people ask
Is CQQQ the same as MCHI?
6.2% of their weight sits in the same 34 holdings. CQQQ also reports PDD, TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD., HUA HONG SEMICONDUCTOR LTD., which the other does not. MCHI also reports TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED, BABA, CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CQQQ and MCHI measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CQQQ and 96% of MCHI, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, MCHI or CQQQ?
CQQQ reports 168 stock positions and MCHI reports 515. 62.4% of CQQQ's weight sits in names MCHI does not hold, and 89.4% of MCHI's weight in names CQQQ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 51.1% of CQQQ and 41.3% of MCHI.
How do CQQQ and MCHI differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: CQQQ has 5.9 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.