CQQQ vs QTEC overlap - what they share and where they differ
CQQQ and QTEC share 1.9% of their weight across 1 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CQQQ and QTEC
1.9%
1 shared positions
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 168 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 51.1%·Holdings of CQQQ
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 46 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 28.7%·Holdings of QTEC
Reported positions cover CQQQ 100%, QTEC 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
QTEC vs CQQQ side by side
CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
168
stock positions reported to the SEC
91.4% of its weight is in 167 names QTEC does not hold
QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
46
stock positions reported to the SEC
98.1% of its weight is in 45 names CQQQ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: QTEC has 69.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CQQQ | QTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 168 | 46 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 51.1% | 28.7% |
| Largest position | MEITUAN 8.6% | AMAT 3.4% |
| Held alone | 167 positions, 91.4% | 45 positions, 98.1% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CQQQ | In QTEC | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDDPDD Holdings Inc. | 8.48% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CQQQ
Only in QTEC
Questions people ask
Is CQQQ the same as QTEC?
1.9% of their weight sits in the same 1 holdings. CQQQ also reports MEITUAN, TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD., BIDU, which the other does not. QTEC also reports AMAT, KLAC, MRVL, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CQQQ and QTEC measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CQQQ and 100% of QTEC, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, QTEC or CQQQ?
CQQQ reports 168 stock positions and QTEC reports 46. 91.4% of CQQQ's weight sits in names QTEC does not hold, and 98.1% of QTEC's weight in names CQQQ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 51.1% of CQQQ and 28.7% of QTEC.
How do CQQQ and QTEC differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: QTEC has 69.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.