DFEM vs IEMG overlap - what they share and where they differ

DFEM and IEMG share 62.7% of their weight across 1,357 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.

Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.

DFEM and IEMG

62.7%

1,357 shared positions

DFEM

Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF

Reported positions cover 89% of the fund, 2,205 positions · Apr 30, 2026

Top 10: 21.9%·Holdings of DFEM

IEMG

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 1,755 positions · May 31, 2026

Top 10: 34.6%·Holdings of IEMG

Reported positions cover DFEM 89%, IEMG 97% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.

IEMG vs DFEM side by side

DFEMDimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF

2,205

stock positions reported to the SEC

10.1% of its weight is in 848 names IEMG does not hold

IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

1,755

stock positions reported to the SEC

9.5% of its weight is in 398 names DFEM does not hold

Where each fund's weight sits

DFEM
IEMG
shared with the other fundheld alonenot covered by the filing (cash, futures, bonds)

Largest sectors for both funds

Technology
15.2%
22.6%
Financial Services
1.4%
2.7%
Basic Materials
0.0%
1.6%
Consumer Cyclical
0.9%
1.4%
Industrials
0.7%
0.0%
Energy
0.7%
0.6%

The widest gap is Technology: IEMG has 7.5 points more of it.

The figures side by side

DFEMIEMG
Filing dateApr 30, 2026May 31, 2026
Stock positions reported2,2051,755
Weight of the ten largest21.9%34.6%
Largest positionTSM 9.2%TSM 12.5%
Held alone848 positions, 10.1%398 positions, 9.5%
Covered by stock positions89%97%

Holdings they share

StockIn DFEMIn IEMGCounted
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Company Limited9.24%12.49%9.24%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.3.72%7.54%3.72%
SKHYSK hynix Inc.3.20%5.82%3.20%
TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED1.95%2.37%1.95%
BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited0.95%1.82%0.95%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION0.75%0.72%0.72%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC.0.51%1.02%0.51%
PBRPetroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras)0.52%0.50%0.50%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY0.44%0.44%0.44%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.0.40%0.79%0.40%

What each holds alone

The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.

Only in DFEM

PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED0.09%
VEDANTA ALUMINIUM METAL LTD0.07%
BHARAT DYNAMICS LTD0.06%
CO-TECH DEVELOPMENT CORP.0.06%
ADVANCED INFO SERVICE PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED0.05%
HTHTH World Group Limited0.05%
PT ANEKA TAMBANG TBK0.05%
DELTA ELECTRONICS (THAILAND) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED0.04%
ESCORTS KUBOTA LIMITED0.04%
TAIFLEX SCIENTIFIC CO.,LTD0.04%

Only in IEMG

SK SQUARE CO., LTD.0.53%
VALEVALE S.A.0.41%
NU HOLDINGS LTD.0.31%
NASPERS LIMITED0.28%
BIDUBAIDU, INC.0.26%
GFIGold Fields Limited0.24%
JDJD.COM, INC.0.24%
HYUNDAI MOBIS CO.,LTD0.20%
BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED0.18%
KIA CORPORATION0.18%

Questions people ask

Is DFEM the same as IEMG?

62.7% of their weight sits in the same 1,357 holdings. DFEM also reports PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, VEDANTA ALUMINIUM METAL LTD, BHARAT DYNAMICS LTD, which the other does not. IEMG also reports SK SQUARE CO., LTD., VALE, NU HOLDINGS LTD., which the other does not.

How is the overlap between DFEM and IEMG measured?

For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 89% of DFEM and 97% of IEMG, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.

Which holds more, IEMG or DFEM?

DFEM reports 2,205 stock positions and IEMG reports 1,755. 10.1% of DFEM's weight sits in names IEMG does not hold, and 9.5% of IEMG's weight in names DFEM does not hold. The ten largest positions are 21.9% of DFEM and 34.6% of IEMG.

How do DFEM and IEMG differ by sector?

The widest gap is Technology: IEMG has 7.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.

Where do the numbers come from?

From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.

Other pairs with these funds

IEMG against other funds in the table

Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs

Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.