DYNF vs MTUM overlap - what they share and where they differ
DYNF and MTUM share 35.8% of their weight across 65 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
DYNF and MTUM
35.8%
65 shared positions
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 205 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 43.7%·Holdings of DYNF
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 125 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 41.5%·Holdings of MTUM
Reported positions cover DYNF 100%, MTUM 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
MTUM vs DYNF side by side
DYNFiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
205
stock positions reported to the SEC
63.7% of its weight is in 140 names MTUM does not hold
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
125
stock positions reported to the SEC
20.3% of its weight is in 60 names DYNF does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Energy: MTUM has 11.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| DYNF | MTUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 205 | 125 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 43.7% | 41.5% |
| Largest position | NVDA 7.9% | MU 5.9% |
| Held alone | 140 positions, 63.7% | 60 positions, 20.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In DYNF | In MTUM | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.82% | 4.60% | 4.60% |
| XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 2.96% | 3.77% | 2.96% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.86% | 4.72% | 2.86% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.04% | 3.54% | 2.04% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc | 2.01% | 2.55% | 2.01% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.74% | 3.09% | 1.74% |
| CATCaterpillar Inc | 1.72% | 3.65% | 1.72% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.59% | 1.75% | 1.59% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 1.58% | 5.87% | 1.58% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 1.54% | 3.10% | 1.54% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in DYNF
Only in MTUM
Questions people ask
Is DYNF the same as MTUM?
35.8% of their weight sits in the same 65 holdings. DYNF also reports NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, which the other does not. MTUM also reports SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, KLAC, ADI, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between DYNF and MTUM measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of DYNF and 100% of MTUM, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, MTUM or DYNF?
DYNF reports 205 stock positions and MTUM reports 125. 63.7% of DYNF's weight sits in names MTUM does not hold, and 20.3% of MTUM's weight in names DYNF does not hold. The ten largest positions are 43.7% of DYNF and 41.5% of MTUM.
How do DYNF and MTUM differ by sector?
The widest gap is Energy: MTUM has 11.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.