EEM vs FXI overlap - what they share and where they differ
EEM and FXI share 12.9% of their weight across 50 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EEM and FXI
12.9%
50 shared positions
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 911 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 39.5%·Holdings of EEM
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 50 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 56.6%·Holdings of FXI
Reported positions cover EEM 97%, FXI 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
FXI vs EEM side by side
EEMiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
911
stock positions reported to the SEC
84.2% of its weight is in 861 names FXI does not hold
FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF
50
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.0% of its weight is in 0 names EEM does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: EEM has 7.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EEM | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 911 | 50 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 39.5% | 56.6% |
| Largest position | TSM 14.3% | BABA 8.7% |
| Held alone | 861 positions, 84.2% | 0 positions, 0.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 97% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EEM | In FXI | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED | 2.71% | 7.72% | 2.71% |
| BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 2.08% | 8.66% | 2.08% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION | 0.82% | 8.25% | 0.82% |
| XIAOMI CORPORATION | 0.48% | 5.41% | 0.48% |
| INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 0.46% | 6.02% | 0.46% |
| PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) COMPANY OF CHINA, LTD. | 0.44% | 4.41% | 0.44% |
| BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 0.38% | 3.72% | 0.38% |
| MEITUAN | 0.38% | 4.79% | 0.38% |
| BYD COMPANY LIMITED | 0.37% | 4.09% | 0.37% |
| NTESNETEASE, INC. | 0.33% | 3.56% | 0.33% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EEM
Only in FXI
Nothing among its reported positions that the others do not also hold.
Questions people ask
Is EEM the same as FXI?
12.9% of their weight sits in the same 50 holdings. EEM also reports TSM, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SKHY, which the other does not. Among its reported positions, FXI holds nothing the other does not also hold.
How is the overlap between EEM and FXI measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 97% of EEM and 100% of FXI, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, FXI or EEM?
EEM reports 911 stock positions and FXI reports 50. 84.2% of EEM's weight sits in names FXI does not hold, and 0.0% of FXI's weight in names EEM does not hold. The ten largest positions are 39.5% of EEM and 56.6% of FXI.
How do EEM and FXI differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: EEM has 7.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
EEM against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.