EEM vs MCHI overlap - what they share and where they differ

EEM and MCHI share 19.5% of their weight across 331 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.

Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.

EEM and MCHI

19.5%

331 shared positions

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 911 positions · May 31, 2026

Top 10: 39.5%·Holdings of EEM

MCHI

iShares MSCI China ETF

Reported positions cover 96% of the fund, 515 positions · May 31, 2026

Top 10: 41.3%·Holdings of MCHI

Reported positions cover EEM 97%, MCHI 96% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.

MCHI vs EEM side by side

EEMiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

911

stock positions reported to the SEC

77.6% of its weight is in 580 names MCHI does not hold

MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF

515

stock positions reported to the SEC

2.9% of its weight is in 184 names EEM does not hold

Where each fund's weight sits

EEM
MCHI
shared with the other fundheld alonenot covered by the filing (cash, futures, bonds)

Largest sectors for both funds

Technology
25.7%
15.5%
Consumer Cyclical
1.5%
3.1%
Financial Services
3.0%
0.0%
Basic Materials
1.7%
0.0%
Industrials
0.0%
1.0%
Healthcare
0.0%
0.8%

The widest gap is Technology: EEM has 10.2 points more of it.

The figures side by side

EEMMCHI
Filing dateMay 31, 2026May 31, 2026
Stock positions reported911515
Weight of the ten largest39.5%41.3%
Largest positionTSM 14.3%TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED 13.2%
Held alone580 positions, 77.6%184 positions, 2.9%
Covered by stock positions97%96%

Holdings they share

StockIn EEMIn MCHICounted
TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED2.71%13.21%2.71%
BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited2.08%10.14%2.08%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION0.82%4.04%0.82%
XIAOMI CORPORATION0.48%2.35%0.48%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED0.46%2.25%0.46%
PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) COMPANY OF CHINA, LTD.0.44%2.15%0.44%
BANK OF CHINA LIMITED0.38%1.88%0.38%
MEITUAN0.38%1.84%0.38%
BYD COMPANY LIMITED0.37%1.81%0.37%
NTESNETEASE, INC.0.33%1.63%0.33%

What each holds alone

The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.

Only in EEM

TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited14.26%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.8.61%
SKHYSK hynix Inc.6.64%
MEDIATEK INC.1.62%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC.1.17%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.0.90%
HDBHDFC BANK LIMITED0.70%
RSRELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED0.66%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD0.62%
SK SQUARE CO., LTD.0.60%

Only in MCHI

COSCO SHIPPING ENERGY TRANSPORTATION CO., LTD.0.03%
SHENZHEN MEGMEET ELECTRICAL CO., LTD.0.03%
SUZHOU MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.0.03%
ACMRACM Research Shanghai Inc0.02%
AMLOGIC SHANGHAI CO LTD0.02%
ANJI MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.0.02%
ANKER INNOVATIONS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD0.02%
BEIJING COMPASS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.0.02%
BLUEFOCUS INTELLIGENT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP CO., LTD.0.02%
CHANGJIANG SECURITIES COMPANY LIMITED0.02%

Questions people ask

Is EEM the same as MCHI?

19.5% of their weight sits in the same 331 holdings. EEM also reports TSM, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SKHY, which the other does not. MCHI also reports COSCO SHIPPING ENERGY TRANSPORTATION CO., LTD., SHENZHEN MEGMEET ELECTRICAL CO., LTD., SUZHOU MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., which the other does not.

How is the overlap between EEM and MCHI measured?

For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 97% of EEM and 96% of MCHI, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.

Which holds more, MCHI or EEM?

EEM reports 911 stock positions and MCHI reports 515. 77.6% of EEM's weight sits in names MCHI does not hold, and 2.9% of MCHI's weight in names EEM does not hold. The ten largest positions are 39.5% of EEM and 41.3% of MCHI.

How do EEM and MCHI differ by sector?

The widest gap is Technology: EEM has 10.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.

Where do the numbers come from?

From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.

Other pairs with these funds

EEM against other funds in the table

Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs

Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.