EEM vs SPEM overlap - what they share and where they differ
EEM and SPEM share 63.1% of their weight across 731 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EEM and SPEM
63.1%
731 shared positions
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 1,060 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 38.0%·Holdings of EEM
SPEM
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 2,718 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 26.7%·Holdings of SPEM
Reported positions cover EEM 97%, SPEM 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
SPEM vs EEM side by side
EEMiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1,060
stock positions reported to the SEC
28.9% of its weight is in 329 names SPEM does not hold
SPEMState Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2,718
stock positions reported to the SEC
24.7% of its weight is in 1,987 names EEM does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: EEM has 3.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EEM | SPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Aug 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 1,060 | 2,718 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 38.0% | 26.7% |
| Largest position | TSM 15.0% | TSM 14.7% |
| Held alone | 329 positions, 28.9% | 1,987 positions, 24.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 97% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EEM | In SPEM | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 15.03% | 14.65% | 14.65% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED | 2.87% | 2.74% | 2.74% |
| BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.94% | 1.79% | 1.79% |
| MEDIATEK INC. | 1.45% | 1.82% | 1.45% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. | 0.92% | 1.13% | 0.92% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION | 0.84% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. | 0.78% | 0.93% | 0.78% |
| HDBHDFC BANK LIMITED | 0.70% | 0.84% | 0.70% |
| RSRELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.66% |
| IBNICICI BANK LIMITED | 0.64% | 0.71% | 0.64% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EEM
Only in SPEM
Questions people ask
Is EEM the same as SPEM?
63.1% of their weight sits in the same 731 holdings. EEM also reports SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SKHY, SK SQUARE CO., LTD., which the other does not. SPEM also reports PDD, AL RAJHI BANK, DELTA ELECTRONICS THAILAND PCL, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EEM and SPEM measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 97% of EEM and 100% of SPEM, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, SPEM or EEM?
EEM reports 1,060 stock positions and SPEM reports 2,718. 28.9% of EEM's weight sits in names SPEM does not hold, and 24.7% of SPEM's weight in names EEM does not hold. The ten largest positions are 38.0% of EEM and 26.7% of SPEM.
How do EEM and SPEM differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: EEM has 3.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.