EFA vs EFAV overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFA and EFAV share 36.4% of their weight across 242 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFA and EFAV
36.4%
242 shared positions
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 628 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 14.4%·Holdings of EFA
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 243 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 14.6%·Holdings of EFAV
Reported positions cover EFA 98%, EFAV 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
EFAV vs EFA side by side
EFAiShares MSCI EAFE ETF
628
stock positions reported to the SEC
50.4% of its weight is in 386 names EFAV does not hold
EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
243
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.0% of its weight is in 1 names EFA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: EFA has 6.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFA | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 628 | 243 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 14.4% | 14.6% |
| Largest position | ASML 2.9% | SECOM CO., LTD. 1.6% |
| Held alone | 386 positions, 50.4% | 1 positions, 0.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 98% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFA | In EFAV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVSNovartis AG | 1.30% | 1.41% | 1.30% |
| SHELSHELL PLC | 1.17% | 1.51% | 1.17% |
| NESTLE S.A. | 1.17% | 1.03% | 1.03% |
| TTETOTALENERGIES SE | 0.79% | 1.38% | 0.79% |
| NODKNISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD. | 0.68% | 1.13% | 0.68% |
| AZNASTRAZENECA PLC | 1.17% | 0.67% | 0.67% |
| IBERDROLA, S.A. | 0.67% | 1.53% | 0.67% |
| BPBPER BANCA S.P.A. | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.65% |
| ROCHE HOLDING AG | 1.45% | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| ULUNILEVER PLC | 0.63% | 1.18% | 0.63% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFA
Only in EFAV
Questions people ask
Is EFA the same as EFAV?
36.4% of their weight sits in the same 242 holdings. EFA also reports HSBC, SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, BHP, which the other does not. EFAV also reports PANW, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EFA and EFAV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EFA and 98% of EFAV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, EFAV or EFA?
EFA reports 628 stock positions and EFAV reports 243. 50.4% of EFA's weight sits in names EFAV does not hold, and 0.0% of EFAV's weight in names EFA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 14.4% of EFA and 14.6% of EFAV.
How do EFA and EFAV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: EFA has 6.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.