EFA vs EFG overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFA and EFG share 54.6% of their weight across 340 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFA and EFG
54.6%
340 shared positions
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 628 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 14.4%·Holdings of EFA
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 340 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 21.1%·Holdings of EFG
Reported positions cover EFA 98%, EFG 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
EFG vs EFA side by side
EFAiShares MSCI EAFE ETF
628
stock positions reported to the SEC
40.9% of its weight is in 288 names EFG does not hold
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
340
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.0% of its weight is in 0 names EFA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: EFA has 5.9 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFA | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 628 | 340 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 14.4% | 21.1% |
| Largest position | ASML 2.9% | ASML 5.9% |
| Held alone | 288 positions, 40.9% | 0 positions, 0.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 98% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFA | In EFG | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASMLASML Holding N.V. | 2.90% | 5.92% | 2.90% |
| AZNASTRAZENECA PLC | 1.17% | 2.38% | 1.17% |
| ROCHE HOLDING AG | 1.45% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA | 0.95% | 1.94% | 0.95% |
| NVSNovartis AG | 1.30% | 0.93% | 0.93% |
| SAPSAP SE | 0.87% | 1.77% | 0.87% |
| SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE | 0.84% | 1.71% | 0.84% |
| SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT | 1.10% | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC | 0.76% | 1.55% | 0.76% |
| UBS GROUP AG | 0.76% | 1.56% | 0.76% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFA
Only in EFG
Nothing among its reported positions that the others do not also hold.
Questions people ask
Is EFA the same as EFG?
54.6% of their weight sits in the same 340 holdings. EFA also reports HSBC, MUFG, NESTLE S.A., which the other does not. Among its reported positions, EFG holds nothing the other does not also hold.
How is the overlap between EFA and EFG measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EFA and 98% of EFG, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, EFG or EFA?
EFA reports 628 stock positions and EFG reports 340. 40.9% of EFA's weight sits in names EFG does not hold, and 0.0% of EFG's weight in names EFA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 14.4% of EFA and 21.1% of EFG.
How do EFA and EFG differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: EFA has 5.9 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.