EFA vs EFV overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFA and EFV share 56.4% of their weight across 374 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFA and EFV
56.4%
374 shared positions
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 628 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 14.4%·Holdings of EFA
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 374 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 20.4%·Holdings of EFV
Reported positions cover EFA 98%, EFV 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
EFV vs EFA side by side
EFAiShares MSCI EAFE ETF
628
stock positions reported to the SEC
40.5% of its weight is in 254 names EFV does not hold
EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
374
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.0% of its weight is in 0 names EFA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: EFA has 6.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFA | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 628 | 374 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 14.4% | 20.4% |
| Largest position | ASML 2.9% | HSBC 3.2% |
| Held alone | 254 positions, 40.5% | 0 positions, 0.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFA | In EFV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSBCHSBC HOLDINGS PLC | 1.66% | 3.22% | 1.66% |
| MUFGMitsubishi Corporation | 1.49% | 2.92% | 1.49% |
| ROCHE HOLDING AG | 1.45% | 1.84% | 1.45% |
| NVSNovartis AG | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.30% |
| NESTLE S.A. | 1.17% | 2.29% | 1.17% |
| SHELSHELL PLC | 1.17% | 2.28% | 1.17% |
| SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT | 1.10% | 1.41% | 1.10% |
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 0.97% | 1.24% | 0.97% |
| BANCO SANTANDER, S.A. | 0.93% | 1.18% | 0.93% |
| ALLIANZ SE | 0.86% | 1.68% | 0.86% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFA
Only in EFV
Nothing among its reported positions that the others do not also hold.
Questions people ask
Is EFA the same as EFV?
56.4% of their weight sits in the same 374 holdings. EFA also reports ASML, AZN, COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, which the other does not. Among its reported positions, EFV holds nothing the other does not also hold.
How is the overlap between EFA and EFV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EFA and 99% of EFV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, EFV or EFA?
EFA reports 628 stock positions and EFV reports 374. 40.5% of EFA's weight sits in names EFV does not hold, and 0.0% of EFV's weight in names EFA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 14.4% of EFA and 20.4% of EFV.
How do EFA and EFV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: EFA has 6.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.