EFA vs FLJP overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFA and FLJP share 22.9% of their weight across 150 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFA and FLJP
22.9%
150 shared positions
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 628 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 14.4%·Holdings of EFA
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 427 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 28.4%·Holdings of FLJP
Reported positions cover EFA 98%, FLJP 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
FLJP vs EFA side by side
EFAiShares MSCI EAFE ETF
628
stock positions reported to the SEC
74.7% of its weight is in 478 names FLJP does not hold
FLJPFranklin FTSE Japan ETF
427
stock positions reported to the SEC
15.1% of its weight is in 277 names EFA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Healthcare: EFA has 4.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFA | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 628 | 427 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 14.4% | 28.4% |
| Largest position | ASML 2.9% | MUFG 4.8% |
| Held alone | 478 positions, 74.7% | 277 positions, 15.1% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFA | In FLJP | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUFGMitsubishi Corporation | 1.49% | 4.83% | 1.49% |
| TMTOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION | 0.81% | 2.89% | 0.81% |
| SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. | 0.71% | 2.27% | 0.71% |
| NODKNISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD. | 0.68% | 3.17% | 0.68% |
| TOKYO ELECTRON LIMITED | 0.68% | 3.37% | 0.68% |
| ADVANTEST CORPADVANTEST CORPORATION | 0.66% | 2.33% | 0.66% |
| HITACHI LTDHitachi, Ltd. | 0.66% | 1.96% | 0.66% |
| SONYSony Group Corporation | 0.62% | 1.92% | 0.62% |
| SUGPSuntory Beverage & Food Limited | 0.59% | 2.37% | 0.59% |
| MFGMizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 0.56% | 1.81% | 0.56% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFA
Only in FLJP
Questions people ask
Is EFA the same as FLJP?
22.9% of their weight sits in the same 150 holdings. EFA also reports ASML, HSBC, ROCHE HOLDING AG, which the other does not. FLJP also reports AJINOMOTO (JAPAN) COMPANY INC, SMC CORP (JP), KOKUSAI ELECTRIC CORP, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EFA and FLJP measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EFA and 100% of FLJP, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, FLJP or EFA?
EFA reports 628 stock positions and FLJP reports 427. 74.7% of EFA's weight sits in names FLJP does not hold, and 15.1% of FLJP's weight in names EFA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 14.4% of EFA and 28.4% of FLJP.
How do EFA and FLJP differ by sector?
The widest gap is Healthcare: EFA has 4.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.