EFAV vs IEFA overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFAV and IEFA share 32.8% of their weight across 242 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFAV and IEFA
32.8%
242 shared positions
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 243 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 14.6%·Holdings of EFAV
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 2,405 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 12.5%·Holdings of IEFA
Reported positions cover EFAV 98%, IEFA 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IEFA vs EFAV side by side
EFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
243
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.0% of its weight is in 1 names IEFA does not hold
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
2,405
stock positions reported to the SEC
56.4% of its weight is in 2,163 names EFAV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: IEFA has 5.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFAV | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 243 | 2,405 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 14.6% | 12.5% |
| Largest position | SECOM CO., LTD. 1.6% | ASML 2.5% |
| Held alone | 1 positions, 0.0% | 2,163 positions, 56.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 98% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFAV | In IEFA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVSNovartis AG | 1.41% | 1.12% | 1.12% |
| NESTLE S.A. | 1.03% | 1.00% | 1.00% |
| SHELSHELL PLC | 1.51% | 1.00% | 1.00% |
| NODKNintendo Co., Ltd. | 1.13% | 0.94% | 0.94% |
| AZNASTRAZENECA PLC | 0.67% | 1.00% | 0.67% |
| TTETOTALENERGIES SE | 1.38% | 0.67% | 0.67% |
| ROCHE HOLDING AG | 0.65% | 1.25% | 0.65% |
| SAPSAP SE | 0.60% | 0.76% | 0.60% |
| MUFGMitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 0.59% | 1.28% | 0.59% |
| IBERDROLA, S.A. | 1.53% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFAV
Only in IEFA
Questions people ask
Is EFAV the same as IEFA?
32.8% of their weight sits in the same 242 holdings. EFAV also reports PANW, which the other does not. IEFA also reports HSBC, SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, BHP, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EFAV and IEFA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EFAV and 98% of IEFA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IEFA or EFAV?
EFAV reports 243 stock positions and IEFA reports 2,405. 0.0% of EFAV's weight sits in names IEFA does not hold, and 56.4% of IEFA's weight in names EFAV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 14.6% of EFAV and 12.5% of IEFA.
How do EFAV and IEFA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: IEFA has 5.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.