EFG vs EWA overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFG and EWA share 5.6% of their weight across 26 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFG and EWA
5.6%
26 shared positions
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 351 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 21.8%·Holdings of EFG
EWA
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Reported positions cover 91% of the fund, 40 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 64.1%·Holdings of EWA
Reported positions cover EFG 98%, EWA 91% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
EWA vs EFG side by side
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
351
stock positions reported to the SEC
92.5% of its weight is in 325 names EWA does not hold
EWAiShares MSCI Australia ETF
40
stock positions reported to the SEC
48.2% of its weight is in 14 names EFG does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: EWA has 19.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFG | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 351 | 40 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 21.8% | 64.1% |
| Largest position | ASML 5.5% | BHP 15.7% |
| Held alone | 325 positions, 92.5% | 14 positions, 48.2% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 91% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFG | In EWA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA | 1.33% | 13.76% | 1.33% |
| MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITED | 0.61% | 4.31% | 0.61% |
| WESFARMERS LIMITED | 0.59% | 4.51% | 0.59% |
| KOYNCSL LIMITED | 0.43% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
| WOOLWORTHS GROUP LIMITED | 0.30% | 2.14% | 0.30% |
| BRAMBLES LIMITED | 0.22% | 1.12% | 0.22% |
| COLES GROUP LIMITED | 0.21% | 1.45% | 0.21% |
| NTRSNORTHERN STAR RESOURCES LTD | 0.20% | 1.29% | 0.20% |
| ARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITED | 0.19% | 1.38% | 0.19% |
| EVOLUTION MINING LIMITED | 0.18% | 1.24% | 0.18% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFG
Only in EWA
Questions people ask
Is EFG the same as EWA?
5.6% of their weight sits in the same 26 holdings. EFG also reports ASML, AZN, NVS, which the other does not. EWA also reports BHP, WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION, NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EFG and EWA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EFG and 91% of EWA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, EWA or EFG?
EFG reports 351 stock positions and EWA reports 40. 92.5% of EFG's weight sits in names EWA does not hold, and 48.2% of EWA's weight in names EFG does not hold. The ten largest positions are 21.8% of EFG and 64.1% of EWA.
How do EFG and EWA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: EWA has 19.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.