EFG vs EWA overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFG and EWA share 6.9% of their weight across 28 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFG and EWA
6.9%
28 shared positions
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 340 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 21.1%·Holdings of EFG
EWA
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Reported positions cover 92% of the fund, 41 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 63.9%·Holdings of EWA
Reported positions cover EFG 98%, EWA 92% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
EWA vs EFG side by side
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
340
stock positions reported to the SEC
91.3% of its weight is in 312 names EWA does not hold
EWAiShares MSCI Australia ETF
41
stock positions reported to the SEC
33.6% of its weight is in 13 names EFG does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: EWA has 19.0 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFG | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 340 | 41 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 21.1% | 63.9% |
| Largest position | ASML 5.9% | BHP 15.9% |
| Held alone | 312 positions, 91.3% | 13 positions, 33.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 92% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFG | In EWA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA | 1.94% | 12.74% | 1.94% |
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 0.70% | 15.91% | 0.70% |
| WESFARMERS LIMITED | 0.66% | 4.30% | 0.66% |
| MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITED | 0.60% | 4.32% | 0.60% |
| SUGPSumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | 0.35% | 0.97% | 0.35% |
| WOOLWORTHS GROUP LIMITED | 0.32% | 2.35% | 0.32% |
| ARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITED | 0.23% | 1.57% | 0.23% |
| COLES GROUP LIMITED | 0.21% | 1.54% | 0.21% |
| BRAMBLES LIMITED | 0.17% | 1.26% | 0.17% |
| NTRSNORTHERN STAR RESOURCES LTD | 0.17% | 1.53% | 0.17% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFG
Only in EWA
Questions people ask
Is EFG the same as EWA?
6.9% of their weight sits in the same 28 holdings. EFG also reports ASML, AZN, SAP, which the other does not. EWA also reports NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED, WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION, ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EFG and EWA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EFG and 92% of EWA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, EWA or EFG?
EFG reports 340 stock positions and EWA reports 41. 91.3% of EFG's weight sits in names EWA does not hold, and 33.6% of EWA's weight in names EFG does not hold. The ten largest positions are 21.1% of EFG and 63.9% of EWA.
How do EFG and EWA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: EWA has 19.0 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.