EFG vs EWG overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFG and EWG share 9.4% of their weight across 30 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFG and EWG
9.4%
30 shared positions
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 351 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 21.8%·Holdings of EFG
EWG
iShares MSCI Germany ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 52 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 62.4%·Holdings of EWG
Reported positions cover EFG 98%, EWG 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
EWG vs EFG side by side
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
351
stock positions reported to the SEC
88.7% of its weight is in 321 names EWG does not hold
EWGiShares MSCI Germany ETF
52
stock positions reported to the SEC
34.3% of its weight is in 22 names EFG does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Healthcare: EFG has 6.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFG | EWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 351 | 52 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 21.8% | 62.4% |
| Largest position | ASML 5.5% | SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT 12.0% |
| Held alone | 321 positions, 88.7% | 22 positions, 34.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFG | In EWG | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAPSAP SE | 1.70% | 9.49% | 1.70% |
| SIEMENS ENERGY AG | 1.60% | 7.37% | 1.60% |
| INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG | 0.85% | 6.22% | 0.85% |
| SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT | 0.77% | 11.97% | 0.77% |
| RHRheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft | 0.71% | 3.48% | 0.71% |
| DEUTSCHE BOERSE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT | 0.56% | 2.73% | 0.56% |
| E.ON SE | 0.48% | 2.40% | 0.48% |
| DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG | 0.40% | 6.21% | 0.40% |
| ADIDAS AG | 0.29% | 1.66% | 0.29% |
| HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG | 0.29% | 1.49% | 0.29% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFG
Only in EWG
Questions people ask
Is EFG the same as EWG?
9.4% of their weight sits in the same 30 holdings. EFG also reports ASML, AZN, NVS, which the other does not. EWG also reports ALLIANZ SE, MUENCHENER RUECKVERSICHERUNGS-GESELLSCHAFT AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT IN MUENCHEN, DEUTSCHE POST AG, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EFG and EWG measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EFG and 100% of EWG, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, EWG or EFG?
EFG reports 351 stock positions and EWG reports 52. 88.7% of EFG's weight sits in names EWG does not hold, and 34.3% of EWG's weight in names EFG does not hold. The ten largest positions are 21.8% of EFG and 62.4% of EWG.
How do EFG and EWG differ by sector?
The widest gap is Healthcare: EFG has 6.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.