EFG vs IQLT overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFG and IQLT share 46.2% of their weight across 162 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFG and IQLT
46.2%
162 shared positions
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 351 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 21.8%·Holdings of EFG
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 279 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 25.0%·Holdings of IQLT
Reported positions cover EFG 98%, IQLT 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IQLT vs EFG side by side
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
351
stock positions reported to the SEC
46.0% of its weight is in 189 names IQLT does not hold
IQLTiShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
279
stock positions reported to the SEC
39.4% of its weight is in 117 names EFG does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: IQLT has 5.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFG | IQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 351 | 279 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 21.8% | 25.0% |
| Largest position | ASML 5.5% | ASML 6.0% |
| Held alone | 189 positions, 46.0% | 117 positions, 39.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFG | In IQLT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASMLASML Holding N.V. | 5.46% | 6.04% | 5.46% |
| NVSNovartis AG | 2.73% | 2.25% | 2.25% |
| AZNASTRAZENECA PLC | 2.86% | 2.02% | 2.02% |
| ABB LTD | 1.54% | 2.21% | 1.54% |
| SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE | 1.70% | 1.54% | 1.54% |
| ADVANTEST CORPORATION | 1.39% | 1.55% | 1.39% |
| TOKYO ELECTRON LIMITED | 1.28% | 1.17% | 1.17% |
| NVONOVO NORDISK A/S | 1.33% | 1.11% | 1.11% |
| LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON SE | 1.29% | 0.96% | 0.96% |
| FAST RETAILING CO., LTD. | 0.87% | 0.85% | 0.85% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFG
Only in IQLT
Questions people ask
Is EFG the same as IQLT?
46.2% of their weight sits in the same 162 holdings. EFG also reports SAP, SIEMENS ENERGY AG, HITACHI, LTD., which the other does not. IQLT also reports SHEL, ALLIANZ SE, NESTLE S.A., which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EFG and IQLT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EFG and 99% of IQLT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IQLT or EFG?
EFG reports 351 stock positions and IQLT reports 279. 46.0% of EFG's weight sits in names IQLT does not hold, and 39.4% of IQLT's weight in names EFG does not hold. The ten largest positions are 21.8% of EFG and 25.0% of IQLT.
How do EFG and IQLT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: IQLT has 5.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.