EFV vs IEFA overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFV and IEFA share 49.3% of their weight across 374 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFV and IEFA
49.3%
374 shared positions
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 374 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 20.4%·Holdings of EFV
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 2,405 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 12.5%·Holdings of IEFA
Reported positions cover EFV 99%, IEFA 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IEFA vs EFV side by side
EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
374
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.0% of its weight is in 0 names IEFA does not hold
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
2,405
stock positions reported to the SEC
47.7% of its weight is in 2,031 names EFV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: EFV has 6.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFV | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 374 | 2,405 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 20.4% | 12.5% |
| Largest position | HSBC 3.2% | ASML 2.5% |
| Held alone | 0 positions, 0.0% | 2,031 positions, 47.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 98% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFV | In IEFA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSBCHSBC HOLDINGS PLC | 3.22% | 1.42% | 1.42% |
| MUFGMitsubishi Corporation | 2.92% | 1.28% | 1.28% |
| ROCHE HOLDING AG | 1.84% | 1.25% | 1.25% |
| NVSNovartis AG | 1.66% | 1.12% | 1.12% |
| NESTLE S.A. | 2.29% | 1.00% | 1.00% |
| SHELSHELL PLC | 2.28% | 1.00% | 1.00% |
| SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT | 1.41% | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 1.24% | 0.83% | 0.83% |
| BANCO SANTANDER, S.A. | 1.18% | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| SUGPSuntory Beverage & Food Limited | 0.85% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFV
Nothing among its reported positions that the others do not also hold.
Only in IEFA
Questions people ask
Is EFV the same as IEFA?
49.3% of their weight sits in the same 374 holdings. Among its reported positions, EFV holds nothing the other does not also hold. IEFA also reports ASML, AZN, COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EFV and IEFA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of EFV and 98% of IEFA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IEFA or EFV?
EFV reports 374 stock positions and IEFA reports 2,405. 0.0% of EFV's weight sits in names IEFA does not hold, and 47.7% of IEFA's weight in names EFV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 20.4% of EFV and 12.5% of IEFA.
How do EFV and IEFA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: EFV has 6.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.